|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,695
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Dear All,
I have just rebuilt FOAM on my (new) Mac Pro using Snow Leopard, and linking to a native mpi. I am happy to say that the new operating system on 4 cores gives me the execution time 3 times faster (!) than the old OS on the identical machine with identical code. The timing for 5 iterations is 310 seconds (new) vs. 749 seconds (old) for a large case with GGI interfaces. Important changes are the new OS (Snow), new native compiler (4.2, tweaked by the looks of things) and native mpi (also tweaked). Any info from McFOAMers on the improvements in the OS would be welcome. Basic port required one (stupid) change that is checked in + some hacking to make sure the Third Party pack compiles properly. The 1.6-dev is in the works - watch this space. Just so you know, Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Daniel WEI (老魏)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Posts: 642
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Shocking! Buy Snow Leopard next time
__________________
Daniel WEI -------------------- NatHaz Modeling Laboratory, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering & Earth Sciences at the University of Notre Dame Email || my-personal-website || my-New-CFD-Blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Assistant Moderator
Bernhard Gschaider
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,116
Rep Power: 30 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
) but my OF installation was compiled on Leopard so I might do a benchmark now and then recompile. Of course by blindly upgrading I lost the opportunity to compare the effect of the OS. And I used a 4.3-gcc which might make a differenceBernhard |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Posts: 749
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Any idea how the performance is compared to Linux?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Pierre-Olivier Dallaire
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 178
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Good morning Gents-
on this topic, I'd like to suggest a very minor change for the Darwin wmake rules : - on my intel machine, it seems that wmake needs rules/darwinIntelGcc instead of rules/darwinIntel - in rules/darwinIntelGcc/general, I suggest using cpp-4.2 instead of cpp And yes, GGI works well under snow leopard :-) Best regards, PO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,695
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
"Thy will be done"
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Pierre-Olivier Dallaire
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 178
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Sounds good !
Regarding ggi (used as a sliding interface in my case) / is it possible it's not compatible with libfvMotionSolvers.so ? I'm getting a strange warning : Not implemented From function coupledFacePointPatch: ointNormals() constin file meshes/pointMesh/pointPatches/derived/coupled/coupledFacePointPatch.C at line 74. Let me know if you prefer that I post this ggi question on another thread Thanks PO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Pierre-Olivier Dallaire
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 178
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
sorry, my question was not clear, I should reformulate by saying that I'm
trying to use the velocityComponentLaplacian solver from dynamicMotionSolverFvMesh where my mesh has 2 regions connected with a ggi. Regards, PO |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modified OpenFOAM Forum Structure and New Mailing-List | pete | Site News & Announcements | 0 | June 29, 2009 05:56 |
| OpenFOAM 15 on Mac OS X Leopard | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | April 29, 2009 13:33 |
| OpenFOAM on mac OSX | Nick Colam | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 27, 2009 00:06 |
| 64bitrhel5 OF installation instructions | mirko | OpenFOAM Installation | 2 | August 12, 2008 18:07 |