# using fieldAverage library to average postprocessing

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

April 4, 2013, 07:43
#21
Senior Member

Jie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Hanzo If my calculations are right then UPrime2Mean should exactly be what it says: U-prime, squared and averaged = . To check this, you can compute u' using U and , calculate u'^2 and average it manually. I did this for a series of data sets and when I compared UPrime2Mean with manually generated they turned out to be the same. Another hint is the magnitude. In my computations, the biggest components of UMean_X are around 0.97 and UPrime2Mean_XX of 0.0025. UPrime2Mean cannot be U^2
Hi Hanzo

Thanks for your quick reply. I was not saying UPrime2Mean is U^2. I calculate the UPrime and found it is the same as sqrt(UPrime2Mean). I got confused as eelcovv hinted " you can obtain the <u'^2> by subtracting the Umean squared from the Uprime2mean". I am not trying to offend anyone but find the right meaning of UPrime2Mean.

Thanks

jiejie

April 4, 2013, 08:47
#22
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tokyo / Japan
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by jiejie I am not trying to offend anyone but find the right meaning of UPrime2Mean.
I am sorry if my comment let you feel like this. I did not want to say that you are offending anyone. It's just my raw english I am also highly interested in the correct meaning of UPrime2Mean.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jiejie Hi Hanzo Thanks for your quick reply. I was not saying UPrime2Mean is U^2. I calculate the UPrime and found it is the same as sqrt(UPrime2Mean). I got confused as eelcovv hinted " you can obtain the by subtracting the Umean squared from the Uprime2mean".
How did you compute UPrime? Did you take U - UMean and averaged this over several time steps? Or for a single realization only?
Averaging this would give <u'> (should be a value close to zero, right?). And then you compared to sqrt( UPrime2Mean ) (which is related to the rms value sqrt(<u'^2>) according to my understanding).
If you are right then UPrime2Mean gives <u'>^2.

Could you describe a little bit more in detail what you calculated?
I really hope that UPrime2Mean_XX corresponds to <u_x'^2>,
UPrime2Mean_YY to <u_y'^2> and so on. If not I have to recheck quite some of my results

April 4, 2013, 08:58
#23
Senior Member

Jie
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 123
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Hanzo I am sorry if my comment let you feel like this. I did not want to say that you are offending anyone. It's just my raw english I am also highly interested in the correct meaning of UPrime2Mean. Could you describe a little bit more in detail what you calculated? I really hope that UPrime2Mean_XX corresponds to , UPrime2Mean_YY to and so on. If not I have to recheck quite some of my results
Hi Hanzo

I thought I might upset eelcovv as I was confused with his hint . Anyway, I actually output the flow field for every single time step and use the postprocessing utility sample to probe the velocity at a few locations. Then, I calculate the the veocity RMS by its definition, which should be the UPrime^2. I did this a while ago, I think the RMS value is very close to the sqrt of UPrime2Mean. That's why I am thinking UPrime2Mean is giving the correct result.

jiejie

 July 22, 2013, 16:26 #24 Senior Member   Eelco van Vliet Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 123 Rep Power: 10 Hi jiejie, You are correct, my hint in an ealier post is misleading. The uprime2suare is already correct for U^2. So if you define U(t)=+u'(t) then the uprime2square constains the in this order: no need to subtract anything. Forget my remark about that. If you want to plot for instance the turbulent kinetic energy k over a line sampled from you uprima2square you can just do plot 'sampledline_with_UPrime2Square' u 10.5*(\$2+\$5+\$7)) cheers alquimista likes this.

 November 14, 2013, 08:03 #25 New Member   Rallou Dadioti Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 Hi eelcovv, Thanks for the utility, it is really helpful! However I am not getting the results that I would expect. I have two time directories (0 and 90) and I want to get the average of the U field. Running the application I get the Umean file but the results are not correct, i.e. U in 0 : (0.1107 -0.0027 0.0006), U in 90: (0.0036 -0.1216 -0.0004) and the average I get is: (0.1017 -0.0126 0.0005). Could you give me any hint of what it can be wrong? Thanks! My controlDict: Code: ```/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.1.1 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; location "system"; object controlDict; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // application simpleFoam; startFrom startTime; startTime 0; stopAt endTime; endTime 90; deltaT 1; writeControl timeStep; writeInterval 90; purgeWrite 0; writeFormat ascii; writePrecision 7; writeCompression on; timeFormat general; timePrecision 6; runTimeModifiable true; functions { fieldAverage1 { type fieldAverage; functionObjectLibs ( "libfieldFunctionObjects.so" ); enabled true; cleanRestart true; outputControl timeStep; // outputControl outputTime; outputInterval 1; fields ( U { mean on; prime2Mean on; base time; } ); } }```

January 28, 2014, 15:28
#26
Member

Ken
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 65
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by snappyHex Hi eelcovv, Thanks for the utility, it is really helpful! However I am not getting the results that I would expect. I have two time directories (0 and 90) and I want to get the average of the U field. Running the application I get the Umean file but the results are not correct, i.e. U in 0 : (0.1107 -0.0027 0.0006), U in 90: (0.0036 -0.1216 -0.0004) and the average I get is: (0.1017 -0.0126 0.0005).
snappyHex,

I know this is an old thread, but I am trying to understand what's going on with the postAverage utility as well. Did you ever resolve the problem?

(0.075 -0.04233333333 0.0002666666667)
in 90/UMean. Strange.

I tried creating a single-cell mesh with a uniform velocity of (1 0 0) in timestep '0', and a uniform velocity of (2 0 0) in timestep '1'. Rather than a result of (1.5 0 0), I get (1.333333333 0 0)!

I have attached the case for reference (see README file).

Edit: This seems to be the same problem Yann was having:
Time averaged fields on a defined time range

I think the key lies in the 'uniform/time' files saved in each timestep directory; the information in these files (e.g. deltaT) determines how the averaging is performed! Removing all 'uniform' directories via 'rm -r */uniform' (be careful) changes the results for me. However, it's still not quite right.

For now, I am using ParaView's 'Temporal Statistics' filter and saving the resulting data to VTK (Save Data -> .vtm filetype).
Attached Files
 postAverageProblem.tar.gz (94.5 KB, 23 views)

Last edited by Nucleophobe; January 29, 2014 at 01:24. Reason: Grammar, update on progress

 January 29, 2014, 16:40 postAverage 'bug' fix #27 Member   Ken Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 65 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 6 All, EDIT: the original code for postAverage seems to work fine on OpenFOAM/2.2.0/051613. I was having problems with OpenFOAM/2.1.x/071612. If in doubt, check your setup with the case I posted above or something similar. I have found a solution, but so far it only works if your data is saved at consistent time intervals (1, 2, 3 etc., not 1, 3, 4, 4.5 5.1...). The utility was counting values from the first timestep twice when computing the average. So, for instance, the average of '1' and '2' was (1 + 1 + 2)/3 = 1.3333 instead of (1 + 2) / 2 = 1.5. This may or may not be a big deal; if you are averaging a lot of data with a small standard deviation, you won't even notice. However, if you are trying to average only a few time directories, it can make a big difference. I have fixed the problem by subtracting one from the startTime index 'timeI'. You should also clear or move your '(time)/uniform' directories, or else the '(time)/uniform/time' files will mess up the average. Perhaps changing the functionObject options in 'system/controlDict' would make this unnecessary and allow for averaging data saved at inconsistent time intervals, but I have not tried this yet. Here is my change to postAverage (see bolded line): Code: ```\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ #include "fvCFD.H" int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { argList::noParallel(); timeSelector::addOptions(); # include "setRootCase.H" # include "createTime.H" instantList timeDirs = timeSelector::select0(runTime, args); runTime.setTime(timeDirs[0], 0); # include "createMesh.H" // Cycle through time directories forAll(timeDirs, timeI) { Info<< "Setting startTime index to: " << timeI - 1 << endl; // It is important that we set the startTime index to 'timeI-1' to avoid counting values in the first time directory twice runTime.setTime(timeDirs[timeI], timeI - 1); Info<< "Adding fields for time " << runTime.timeName() << endl; # include "createFields.H" runTime.functionObjects().execute(); } Info<< "\nEnd" << endl; return 0; } // ************************************************************************* //``` This is giving me the results I expect. If someone else knows a better way to fix this problem, please chime in! Good luck, -Nuc Last edited by Nucleophobe; January 29, 2014 at 17:58. Reason: Removed lines in code used for debugging; update on OpenFOAM2.2.0

September 2, 2015, 04:58
#28
New Member

Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Hi everybody !

Thanks eelcovv for this very usefull tool !

However I am now trying to use it with a dynamic mesh case and I am facing some difficulties.
In order to make it work with a mesh changing over the time I've added #include "dynamicFvMesh.H" in the top of the postAverage.C file, I've switched #include "createMesh.H" to #include "createDynamicFvMesh.H" and I've added the line mesh.readUpdate(); in the time loop.
(see the file attached)

When I run the tool it seems to do the calculations but at the end it gives me completely absurd results.

Anybody knows how to make it work correctly with a dynamic mesh ?

Attached Files
 postAverage.C (2.6 KB, 12 views)

 August 8, 2016, 04:53 #29 Member   Manu Chakkingal Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: Delft, Netherlands Posts: 62 Rep Power: 2 Hello Were you able to write the data only at last time step __________________ Regards Manu

 Tags fieldaverage, library average, postprocessing

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Veera Gutti FLUENT 8 July 26, 2016 07:24 Emmanuel FLUENT 2 February 4, 2012 23:04 flying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 May 5, 2009 08:46 matthias OpenFOAM Installation 24 April 28, 2008 15:49 Bowling FLUENT 5 May 12, 2004 04:56

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:42.