
[Sponsors] 
July 8, 2010, 04:36 
fvc::reconstruct( ) algorithm

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 
Hi Foamers,
I am trying to figure out how the fvc::reconstruct( ) algorithm works. My first thought was: Sum up the facefluxes multiplied with the facenormal over a cell and divide it by the sum of the magnitude of the facevector components of every face of the cell. The algorithm in the "fvcReconstruct.C" file seems far more complex then my thought: inv(surfaceSum(sqr(mesh.Sf())/mesh.magSf())) & surfaceSum((mesh.Sf()/mesh.magSf())*ssf) The second line is what I expected, but the first line is a little mystery to me. Can anybody explain this to my, please? Rainer 

July 8, 2010, 09:31 

#2 
Senior Member
David Gaden
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 436
Rep Power: 14 
Just a guess... it looks like it might be nonorthogonal correction...?


July 9, 2010, 11:15 

#3 
Member
Kevin Maki
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 
Rainer, I agree with your description. The first line finds one over the square of the components of the area. The second line has the the components of the area in the numerator, so the result is just one over the area times the sum of what ever you are reconstructing. This is what you want for a faceareaweighted average.
There is another post by Henry which is relevant here: Bugs in fvcsurfaceIntegrate Kevin 

March 16, 2011, 13:27 

#4 
Member
SungEun Kim
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 9 
I am also puzzled by what fvc:reconstruct does. Has anyone here figured what it does? It seems it is not based on any mathematical identity (like Gauss theorem), but some sort of approximation.


January 16, 2012, 13:06 
fvc::reconstruct explaination

#5 
New Member
Thibault Pringuey
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9 
Hello,
I have had a look at the fvc::reconstruct method. Please find attached an attempt to explain it. Cheers, Thibault 

January 17, 2012, 05:00 

#6 
Senior Member

Thibault, excellent! Thank you for you work! Currently I am working on improving my model introducing a reconstruction for them... So hope to find some advantage on using it, will post some general conclusions.
__________________
Best regards, Dr. Alexander VAKHRUSHEV Christian Doppler Laboratory for "Advanced Process Simulation of Solidification and Melting" Simulation and Modelling of Metallurgical Processes Department of Metallurgy University of Leoben FranzJosefStr. 18 A  8700 Leoben Österreich / Austria Tel.: +43 3842  402  3125 http://smmp.unileoben.ac.at 

August 27, 2014, 13:56 

#7 
Member
Charlie
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 415 Kinross Dr. Newark, DE 19711
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 7 
Hi makaveli_lcf,
Did you find any advantage using fvc::reconstruct ? In my experience, using fvc::reconstruct seems too dissipative? need to find out what cause the dissipation, maybe due to the faceweighted averaging ? Just curious, did you find anything similar? 

July 22, 2015, 23:41 

#8 
New Member
Xavier Pivan
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 3 
Hi Cheng,
Did you figure out why renconstruct was too dissipative ? I'm trying to reproduce an experiment with settlingFOAM everything work except that my system dissipate too much and then the velocities are not strong enough. reconstruct might be a start. Thanks 

July 26, 2015, 23:11 

#9 
Senior Member
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Amherst, MA USA  San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 320
Rep Power: 10 
There could be several sources of numerical dissipation. To start make sure you have achieved mesh convergence and using 2nd order discretization.


September 22, 2015, 05:37 

#10 
New Member
Michael
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 3 
I think that fvc::reconstruct is dissipative because it is first order accurate.
It assumes Sum_f n_f ( S_f * u_p) = Sum_f n_f ( S_f * u_f) which is accurate up to irst order. I have another question: What is the difference between the method used to reconstruct the velocity at the cell center from the face center used in fvc::reconstruct and simply calculating it by Sum_f 1/S_f phi_f n_f ? 

October 27, 2015, 06:33 

#11 
New Member
Michael
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 3 
I have to add that the fvc::reconstruct is second order accurate for orthogonal grids. It can be seen by a Taylorseries expansion of the face velocity, i.e., U_f = U_c + dU/dx_c delta x + ... and inserting it into the relation sum n_f (S_f * u_c) = sum n_f (S_f * u_f)


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
About Phase Coupled SIMPLE (PCSIMPLE) algorithm  Yan Kai  Main CFD Forum  0  April 18, 2007 03:48 
About Phase Coupled SIMPLE (PCSIMPLE) algorithm  Yan Kai  FLUENT  0  April 13, 2007 23:17 
machuniform algorithm for LES/DNS  ilyas  Main CFD Forum  0  February 22, 2007 11:53 
LES algorithm  James Fluroe  Main CFD Forum  2  December 27, 2001 18:51 
SIMPLE algorithm  Jonathan Castro  Main CFD Forum  3  December 10, 1999 05:59 