CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

cyclicAMI for non matching geometry?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 29, 2012, 07:54
Question cyclicAMI for non matching geometry?
  #1
tms
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
tms is on a distinguished road
Hello Foamers
If I am not mistaken cyclicAMI can be used to make two independently meshed and moving areas interact with each other. (As seen in the ship's propeller tutorial)
My question: Is it possible to connect two meshes which do not match geometrically? E.g. consider two boxes on top of each other. The upper one like three times the size of the lower one and sliding on top of it.
Any help/comment/discussion would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Thomas
tms is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2012, 09:40
Default
  #2
tms
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
tms is on a distinguished road
PS: A competent 'no' would also be a valuable answer...
tms is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2012, 13:42
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Attesz's Avatar
 
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
Attesz is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by tms View Post
Hello Foamers
If I am not mistaken cyclicAMI can be used to make two independently meshed and moving areas interact with each other. (As seen in the ship's propeller tutorial)
My question: Is it possible to connect two meshes which do not match geometrically? E.g. consider two boxes on top of each other. The upper one like three times the size of the lower one and sliding on top of it.
Any help/comment/discussion would be greatly appreciated.
Best,
Thomas
No!

It is not possible to do currently, maybe you should try 1.6-ext, but I'm not familiar with the features of that code. I had a simulation where only a half cell was non-overlapped with the other side, and the simulation stopped. Hopefully, OpenCFD will improve this very soon.

Best,
Attila
__________________
CFD= Cleverly Formatted Data
Attesz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2012, 13:51
Default
  #4
Member
 
Hannes Kröger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 9
hannes is on a distinguished road
You could try the "stitchMesh" tool to connect the grids.
hannes is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2012, 13:52
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Attesz's Avatar
 
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
Attesz is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by hannes View Post
You could try the "stitchMesh" tool to connect the grids.
he want's to do moving on the connecting surfaces as I understood. stitching the mesh doesn't help unfortunately.
__________________
CFD= Cleverly Formatted Data
Attesz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2012, 05:15
Default
  #6
tms
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4
tms is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much, Attila and Hannes!
So it is not possible to move the meshes relative to each other. :-(
Is there a way to define the translation of the boundaries and 'remesh' the entire mesh if neccessary? I think mesh deformation only will not be sufficient in my case because i need an obstacle to be sliding over the ground and then hovering over a channel and continue sliding on the other side's ground.
Best,
Thomas
tms is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2012, 05:30
Red face
  #7
Senior Member
 
Attesz's Avatar
 
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 355
Rep Power: 8
Attesz is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by tms View Post
Thank you very much, Attila and Hannes!
So it is not possible to move the meshes relative to each other. :-(
Is there a way to define the translation of the boundaries and 'remesh' the entire mesh if neccessary? I think mesh deformation only will not be sufficient in my case because i need an obstacle to be sliding over the ground and then hovering over a channel and continue sliding on the other side's ground.
Best,
Thomas
Quote:
So it is not possible to move the meshes relative to each other. :-(
It is possible, but the mesh interfaces may not have any non-overlapped part

Quote:
Is there a way to define the translation of the boundaries and 'remesh' the entire mesh if necessary?
yes but I can't help you in this. i think it's not easy in openfoam. if you generate the mesh with OF tools (blockMesh or snappy) i think it's easier.

Quote:
I think mesh deformation only will not be sufficient in my case because i need an obstacle to be sliding over the ground and then hovering over a channel and continue sliding on the other side's ground.
to define this quite complicated movement is challenging, please inform us if you succeed
__________________
CFD= Cleverly Formatted Data
Attesz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2012, 06:47
Default
  #8
Member
 
Hannes Kröger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rostock, Germany
Posts: 95
Rep Power: 9
hannes is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I haven't used it myself, but there should be the sliding mesh interface. stitchMesh is essentially a frontend for this machinery but I think it can be used standalone as well.

Regards, Hannes
hannes is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cyclic boundary, moving mesh

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem Importing Geometry ProE to CFX fatb0y CFX 3 January 14, 2012 20:42
[DesignModeler] Error while Loading a Geometry JD944 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 October 25, 2011 14:51
Problem meshing an imported geometry Alicia Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 0 March 30, 2010 04:53
Simulation of Flow through Complex 3D Geometry EmersonKB CFX 5 July 2, 2009 08:17
vitual _ real deneb FLUENT 3 January 22, 2007 05:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:52.