CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Low Reynolds LES Simulation questions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 4, 2013, 15:32
Default Low Reynolds LES Simulation questions
  #1
New Member
 
Matt1986's Avatar
 
Matthias K.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Germany Erlangen
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13
Matt1986 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am starting a new thread, because things have changed (boundary conditions etc.)

I am trying to evaluate the drag coefficient of a cylinder with a Reynolds number of 180 in OpenFoam.
I created a 2D case out of the tutorial (motorbike les).
I created a 3D mesh and converted it with extrudeMesh into a 2D mesh.
The mesh is in the attachment.
At such a low reynolds number the flow should be laminar and the Karman vortex street
should be visuable (axis parallel eddies).
In my case the dead water area is getting bigger and bigger with each additional timestep and there is no laminar flow of the fluid. Instead there are huge eddies. I am not sure if I have to use a higher refinement of the mesh, to visualize the Karman vortex street, but imho the mistake of the case should be solved first.

A use the solver pisoFoam and the turbulencemodel SpalardAllmaras.
I used according to the tutorial the following wallfunktions:

nuSgs
nuSgsUSpaldingWallFunction;

k
kqRWallFunction


My max. Courant number is under 0.30 and my y+ values are far below 1.
I have tried to modify the case, but I am not able to get the right laminar behavior of the flow. The drag coefficient is around 1.08 and should be around 1.2.


Can somebody give me an advise, if I have done a mistake or if the used wallfunktions are not applicable at such low reynolds numbers?

Thank you for your time,

Matthias
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 16d86663.l.jpg (69.0 KB, 27 views)

Last edited by Matt1986; January 4, 2013 at 16:08.
Matt1986 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2013, 07:01
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Matt1986's Avatar
 
Matthias K.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Germany Erlangen
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13
Matt1986 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have increased the simulation length and the increasing dead water area converted into a gradually changing vortex system.
In my oppinion the vortex system should be much smaller.
The drag coefficient is in the right range.

Regards Matthias
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 8b1c679f.l.jpg (16.7 KB, 29 views)
Matt1986 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2013, 08:12
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Matt1986's Avatar
 
Matthias K.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Germany Erlangen
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 13
Matt1986 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I got my results of the cfd simulation.
They are in the attachment.
The only value I am not very satisfied with, is the cd coefficient of Re10.
Probably I am able to get a better value with a mesh refinement.
Are there any further suggestions ?

Thanks,
Matthias
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cdvalue.jpg (26.0 KB, 30 views)
File Type: jpeg values.jpeg (13.9 KB, 26 views)
Matt1986 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbulence model for low Reynolds number flow? Nokadu Main CFD Forum 3 May 26, 2013 11:42
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow M.Sc_Student FLUENT 4 April 7, 2010 10:28
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow M.Sc_Student Main CFD Forum 0 April 6, 2010 09:30
low reynolds no. ani Main CFD Forum 1 April 11, 2006 08:23
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48.