|January 23, 2013, 06:14||
are wall and patch inherently different?
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,209Rep Power: 19
if i set at a patch properties to be in this manner:U=U Of wall i want,T and p:zerogradiet then would this patch play the role of a wall?or other things should be included into account?
At which parts of comressible solvers or models i can find an answer for this query?
Thanks a lot.
|January 24, 2013, 02:59||
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Esfahan, Iran
Posts: 52Rep Power: 7
If you are not using turbulence model and you don't have static pressure in your problem and the walls are adiabatic, your boundary conditions are O.K. But in the case of turbulent flow, you should use wallfunctions for K, Epsilon, Reynolds stress tensor(R), nut, and set the boundary condition for nuTilda as zerogradient. If you have heat exchange between wall and fluid or the wall has fixed temperature, the T boundary conditions will be different.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|y+ and u+ values with low-Re RANS turbulence models: utility + testcase||florian_krause||OpenFOAM||110||April 21, 2016 11:54|
|[GAMBIT] periodic faces not matching||Aadhavan||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||6||August 31, 2013 11:25|
|Mesh conversion problem (fluent3DMeshToFoam)||Aadhavan||OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ...||1||December 12, 2012 11:38|
|StarToFoam error||Kart||OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion||1||February 4, 2010 05:38|
|Multicomponent fluid||Andrea||CFX||2||October 11, 2004 05:12|