CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

are wall and patch inherently different?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By immortality
  • 2 Post By asoltoon

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 23, 2013, 05:14
Default are wall and patch inherently different?
  #1
Senior Member
 
immortality's Avatar
 
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 26
immortality is on a distinguished road
if i set at a patch properties to be in this manner:U=U Of wall i want,T and p:zerogradiet then would this patch play the role of a wall?or other things should be included into account?
At which parts of comressible solvers or models i can find an answer for this query?
Thanks a lot.
ali moeni likes this.
immortality is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2013, 01:59
Default
  #2
Member
 
Ali Khalifesoltani
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Esfahan, Iran
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 15
asoltoon is on a distinguished road
Hello Ehsan,

If you are not using turbulence model and you don't have static pressure in your problem and the walls are adiabatic, your boundary conditions are O.K. But in the case of turbulent flow, you should use wallfunctions for K, Epsilon, Reynolds stress tensor(R), nut, and set the boundary condition for nuTilda as zerogradient. If you have heat exchange between wall and fluid or the wall has fixed temperature, the T boundary conditions will be different.

Regards
Ali
immortality and ali moeni like this.
asoltoon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
y+ and u+ values with low-Re RANS turbulence models: utility + testcase florian_krause OpenFOAM 114 August 23, 2023 05:37
[Commercial meshers] Mesh conversion problem (fluent3DMeshToFoam) Aadhavan OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 8, 2018 01:47
[GAMBIT] periodic faces not matching Aadhavan ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 August 31, 2013 11:25
[Other] StarToFoam error Kart OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 4, 2010 04:38
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35.