CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Oscillating Airfoil Poor Results at High k (reduced frequency)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 11, 2013, 23:24
Default Oscillating Airfoil Poor Results at High k (reduced frequency)
  #1
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 8
dancfd is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I am trying to simulate an oscillating 2D airfoil section, angle of attack = 5 +- 5 deg. I find that I can obtain results that match experimental data for Cl quite well at a reduced frequency of k = 0.01, but at k = 0.1, the results do not match very well at all. I have let the simulation run until each cycle produces the same results, but the results do not compare well to experiment.

Can anyone suggest what could improve the simulation results at higher reduced frequency? I am running simpleFoam with a timestep of 5e-5 s and maximum Courant number of about 1. I am "oscillating" the airfoil by using a static mesh and time-dependent boundary condition for U.

Thanks in advance,

Dan
dancfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 24, 2013, 13:39
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tarak
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 7
Tarak is on a distinguished road
Hii Daniel,

Have you tried using AMI for oscillating the airfoil?
Tarak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 24, 2013, 20:52
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 8
dancfd is on a distinguished road
Hello Tarak,

I have looked into AMI, however the options available for compressible solvers (sonicDyMFoam, rhoCentralDyMFoam) do not allow the same mesh motion algorithms as the incompressible solvers (pimpleDyMFoam), and therefore the solution shown by the mixer tutorial cannot be implemented. I have tried adapting rhoPimpleFoam and sonicDyMFoam to use the incompressible-style mesh motion algorithm, so far with little success. It remains unclear to me why the incompressible and compressible solvers would handle mesh motion so differently - when there is no reason to be different, why not remain the same?

Regards,

Dan
dancfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2013, 09:32
Post pitching motion
  #4
Member
 
arash mahboubi
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Iran
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 4
arashfluid is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to arashfluid
Hi foamers,
I am working on FSI problem. I want to move an airfoil with plunging motion.I used NACA 0012 airfoil has a chord length of c=0.15m, that undergoes sinusoidal plunging motion with an angle of attack of the type α(t) = αmean+Δαsin (ωt) around an axis located at quarter of its chord length (0.25c) from the leading edge. I have chosen a sinusoidal motion same as that of the available experimental data, given by α=10°+15°sin(ωt).
How do I apply for this move?
arashfluid is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airfoil grid for turbulent flows: high aspect ratios Marconi Main CFD Forum 1 September 29, 2012 13:01
Problem in cd of oscillating airfoil at high freq. CH FLUENT 0 November 27, 2006 03:31
Reasons for failed validation at high frequency zonexo Main CFD Forum 5 October 23, 2006 09:32
Oscillating airfoil problem ganesh Main CFD Forum 2 June 27, 2005 13:57
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:55.