rhoCentralFoam: making sense of the diffusive corrector equation for energy
Hello!
I'm puzzled with the diffusive corrector equation for energy in rhoCentralFoam, found on lines 232238 in rhoCentralFoam.C. If I understood correctly, the effect of viscous stress tensor, T, is included completely in the predictor equation in line 217, representing the div(T.u) term. Therefore only the contribution of effective heat diffusion is left for the corrector equation. To me it would make more sense to make the corrector equation to be simply Code:
solve Code:
+ fvc::laplacian(turbulence>alpha(), e) // laminar heat diffusion Tatu 
As far as I understand in energy equation diffusive term should have T (not e). But for calculation stabilization it is necessary to include diffusive term while solving equation. Since the equation is solving for e, diffusive term should include e so the term fvm::laplacian(turbulence>alphaEff(), e) is appeared. In corrector step one should replace that term with the right one fvc::laplacian(k, T).
About alpha and alphaEff  I do not know why they are different. May be this is an error? In laminar case it is not essential (alpha==alphaEff) Or more probable: k is "laminar" diffusive coefficient (heat conductivity). alphaEff = alpha + alpha_turb, alpha ~ k/Cv (e=Cv*T). So alphaEff  alpha = alpha_turb. Seemingly for turbulent case it is not so important: use laplacian(alpha_turb, e) or laplacian(k_turb,T) whereas in laminar case it can be significant (when Cv is not constant as I see) 
Thanks for the reply!
Quote:
In principle, e is able to describe diffusivity as well as T (because e=Cv*T in a "fully converged" solution). The three last terms in the corrector equation are used then to make e and T consistent with each other, so that e > Cv*T? Quote:
Code:
volScalarField k("k", thermo.Cp()*muEff/Pr); So do you mean I should use mut instead of muEff, i.e. Code:
volScalarField k("k", thermo.Cp()*mut/Pr); 
Quote:
Quote:
muEff = mu + mut, so k is k_turb + k. Thus my second suggestion about alpha and alphaEff is not true. So one should look in code for the definition of alpha and alphaEff. 
By the way k_turb should be Cp*mut/Pr_turb where Pr_turb is usually 0.9. So definition of k as Cp*muEff/Pr is wrong

I reported the issue with the last two terms as a bug
http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=751 
All times are GMT 4. The time now is 12:31. 