CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Is this simmulation possible on an i7? #cells/cell size?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 13, 2013, 17:22
Default Is this simmulation possible on an i7? #cells/cell size?
  #1
Member
 
Klaus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 8
klausb is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I need to do some simulations of a hydrofoil. The objective is to minimize drag and optimize lift/drag. The hydrofoil operates in water, at speeds up to 15m/s, has a reference length/chrod of 0.1m and a wing span of 1m.

The turbulence model is kklomega. The case is 3D / symmetric hence the simulated wing span will be 0.5m.

y+ = 1 >> wall spacing (with roh = 1000kg/m3 and dynamic viscosity = 0.001002 kg/ms) = 0.000001617678382235965m (calculated with http://www.pointwise.com/yplus/)

Assuming 15 layers will be enough to resolve the boundary layer? this looks like a huge case - too huge for an i7 with 8Gb Ram?

What would be a good choice for the cell size in the boundary layer region (x and z dimension assuming y is the wall spacing mentioned above)?

Any other ideas about how to approach this case?

Klaus
klausb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2013, 22:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
immortality's Avatar
 
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,186
Rep Power: 16
immortality is on a distinguished road
hi
How do you want to optimize airfoil?active or passive?
immortality is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2013, 06:24
Default
  #3
Member
 
sushant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 8
sushant is on a distinguished road
A mesh of 5,000,000 cells works fine for me on i7 with 8GB (4x parallel). Sure, you're not going to solve it in an hour, but I would leave it overnight and have it ready the next morning.

You can stretch it to 7,000,000 probably, but it gets uncomfortable beyond that, memory being the constraint.
sushant is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2013, 14:35
Default
  #4
Member
 
Klaus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 8
klausb is on a distinguished road
I assume active means using a routine that varies some parameters of the shape based on given rules and simulation results? And passive means doing a row of simulations based in different "fixed" configurations.

According to these definitions, it's the passive approach following a thesis related to the optimization of a Boeing plane wing by means of retrofitted winglets.
klausb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 14, 2013, 14:56
Default
  #5
Member
 
Klaus
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 8
klausb is on a distinguished road
I can easily upgrade to 16Gb or even 32Gb RAM if that's the constraint.

But I am struggling to estimate the required cell size (apart from the wall spacing) and number of layers required to resolve the boundary layer to be able to estimate the case size (number of cells) required to figure out whether the available hardware is sufficient or whether I have to invite some friends to a lan party.
klausb is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
critical error during installation of openfoam Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01
OF 1.6 | Ubuntu 9.10 (64bit) | GLIBCXX_3.4.11 not found piprus OpenFOAM Installation 22 February 25, 2010 14:43
Phase locked average in run time panara OpenFOAM 2 February 20, 2008 15:37
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:34.