CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Question about unsteady flow past a cylinder

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By haakon

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 1, 2013, 00:43
Post Question about unsteady flow past a cylinder
  #1
New Member
 
Roger Liu
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 6
rogerliu is on a distinguished road
In this case, I want to simulate unsteady flow past a cylinder at Re=4000.
I have the following questions:
1) how to set ''unsteady'' in OpenFOAM;
2) for the turbulent model, which wall function I should choose? Depends on what?

Thanks!
rogerliu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2013, 04:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
immortality's Avatar
 
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,209
Rep Power: 19
immortality is on a distinguished road
1) you should choose an unsteady incompressible solver like icoFoam.
2)it depends on the turbulent model.which one you choosed?copy the files from a like turbulent tutorial.
immortality is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 1, 2013, 05:01
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Håkon Strandenes
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 111
Rep Power: 11
haakon will become famous soon enough
  1. My personal opinion is that icoFoam is only for testing and educational purposes, even if you are only doing a laminar simulation (i.e. not use a turbulence model). The reason for this is that for example pisoFoam allows more control over the solution process, by allowing two different specifications for linear solvers for the different stages in the PISO-loop/non-northogonal corrections. I use this by specifying a non-zero relative tolerance for p (f.ex. relTol = 0.05), and then (of course) specify zero relative residual for pFinal (relTol = 0). So choose pisoFoam as solver and use a time integrator different than steadyState, and you are ready to go with an unsteady simulation.
  2. First I suggest that you consider whether you need a turbulence model or not at all. At Re = 4000 the boundary layer and separation point is still laminar, and turbulence is only found in the farfield wake region. That means that you have large regions of laminar flow, and a transition to turbulent flow in the wake. There are not many (if some at all) RANS models capable of capturing this behaviour. If you are desperat I suggest that you go for a LES simulation. However, if you have access to a decent workstation, or best, compute cluster, resolving all turbulence scales directly (aka. laminar simulations) might be the best solution. The computational demand for this should not be too big. One show-stopper is of course that the nature of this flow is 3D...
immortality likes this.
haakon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incompressible flow past a 2D rectangular cylinder Niru Main CFD Forum 5 February 8, 2011 05:20
Flow past 2 smooth circular cylinder slip FLUENT 0 July 8, 2010 18:45
Tubulent flow past circular cylinder at Re=3900 Jinglei Main CFD Forum 1 September 11, 2007 06:05
meshing for flow past a cylinder karthik FLUENT 1 July 15, 2005 06:17
Flow past a cylinder at low Re nuray kayakol Main CFD Forum 1 March 6, 2003 13:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11.