CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Convective multi-region HT (MRconjugateHeatFoam)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 13, 2013, 15:32
Default Convective multi-region HT (MRconjugateHeatFoam)
  #1
New Member
 
Cameron
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
Cameron is on a distinguished road
Hey Foamers,

I am interested in a multi-region, heat transfer solver that works with forced convection (chtMultiRegionFoam, features fluid-solid interaction but only simulates natural convection).

Penn State's Dr. Craven and Dr. Campbell gave a really interesting talk at the 6th OF workshop titled "Multi-region Heat / Mass Transfer". In their presentation, they use and describe the solver MRconjugateHeatFoam.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/dab143/O...ven_slides.pdf

I booted up the 6th OF Workshop's distribution from the iso file, but I had no luck finding the solver. Does anyone have a recommendation on where to find it?

Other ideas for modelling the coupled HT of a fluid channel and the solid geometry encasing it would also be welcome!

-Cameron
Cameron is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2013, 04:59
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 4
startingWithCFD is on a distinguished road
Why do you claim/state/suppose that chtMultiRegionFoam deals only with natural convection?
startingWithCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2013, 12:03
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Cameron
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
Cameron is on a distinguished road
My assumption about chtMultiRegionFoam was based on different reports, tutorials, presentations, and forum posts I looked through last week. If it is incorrect, then please let me know!

In other news, I have found the conjugateHeatFoam solver (part of OpenFoam-1.6-ext), and I believe that it will suit my needs well.
Cameron is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2013, 12:31
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 4
startingWithCFD is on a distinguished road
So what is the difference in the equations between a forced convection and a natural convection solver? Is it not just the g-term? This can be deactivated in chtMultiRegionFoam.

If I am not mistaken, the difference between chtMultiRegionFoam and conjugateHeatFoam lies on other characteristics (in-/compressible, coupled/segregated and so on).
startingWithCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2013, 12:13
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
HECKMANN Frédéric
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 8
fredo490 is on a distinguished road
Nature convection is not easy to achieve ! Theoretically yes, you just put a term with g and you should get your result. However, I've never encounter any case that is going smoothly with this.

It is so problematic sometimes that OF has some dedicated solver for Nature Convection.
fredo490 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2013, 15:04
Default
  #6
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 4
startingWithCFD is on a distinguished road
It is nice to know that Fredo, I have never been involved with natural convection. But here I meant that a natural convection solver could probably be easily converted to a forced convection solver, not the other way around. Also, this is just my hypothesis, I would not call myself an expert :-)
startingWithCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2013, 12:30
Default
  #7
New Member
 
caduqued
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 8
caduqued is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
Hey Foamers,

I am interested in a multi-region, heat transfer solver that works with forced convection (chtMultiRegionFoam, features fluid-solid interaction but only simulates natural convection).

Penn State's Dr. Craven and Dr. Campbell gave a really interesting talk at the 6th OF workshop titled "Multi-region Heat / Mass Transfer". In their presentation, they use and describe the solver MRconjugateHeatFoam.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/dab143/O...ven_slides.pdf

I booted up the 6th OF Workshop's distribution from the iso file, but I had no luck finding the solver. Does anyone have a recommendation on where to find it?

Other ideas for modelling the coupled HT of a fluid channel and the solid geometry encasing it would also be welcome!

-Cameron

Hey Cameron,

In any case, to answer your original question, if you still need those files, the original link is this:

http://www.personal.psu.edu/dab143/OFW6/training.htm

Hopefully they will keep the link up for some time.

Regards,
caduqued is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2013, 14:12
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Cameron
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 4
Cameron is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the link caduqued!
Cameron is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2013, 07:47
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Tobi's Avatar
 
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Leoben (Austria)
Posts: 1,100
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 19
Tobi will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to Tobi Send a message via Skype™ to Tobi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron View Post
Hey Foamers,

I am interested in a multi-region, heat transfer solver that works with forced convection (chtMultiRegionFoam, features fluid-solid interaction but only simulates natural convection).

Penn State's Dr. Craven and Dr. Campbell gave a really interesting talk at the 6th OF workshop titled "Multi-region Heat / Mass Transfer". In their presentation, they use and describe the solver MRconjugateHeatFoam.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/dab143/O...ven_slides.pdf

I booted up the 6th OF Workshop's distribution from the iso file, but I had no luck finding the solver. Does anyone have a recommendation on where to find it?

Other ideas for modelling the coupled HT of a fluid channel and the solid geometry encasing it would also be welcome!

-Cameron

Hi,

chtMultiRegion*Foam should be able to calculate forced convection - why should this solver not be able to do that?

In my opinion the natural convection compared with forced convection is very small so you "could" set g to (0 0 0) but that does not make sence in my opinion.

If you get forced convection you always can enable natural convection. It has no big influence but I think your calculating time would not be blow up if you use natrual convection too.


I have solved forced convection 4 years ago in my Bachelor Thesis with the chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam with very good Quality and quantity results (incompressible).


Additionally:

In your title you wrote: (MRconjugateHeatFoam) - so I am asking myself what is the difference:

chtMultiRegion = conjugated heat Transfer of Multi region
(MRconjugateHeatFoam) = Multi Region conjugate heat Transfer




I have no idea which differences are made in that solver - compared to the Standard cht solver in openfoam.
Maybe it could solve compressible fluids too ... ? Do not know.

Maybe you have a better prediction of wall Treatments or stuff like that.
Hence you should compare the solvers but first I would use the official cht solver, make my Simulation and compare it with Literature or measurment data.





Regards Tobi
Tobi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2013, 02:41
Default MRconjugateHeatFoam and chtMultiRegionFoam
  #10
Member
 
Kumudu
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 3
Kumudu is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE=Tobi;463887]Hi,

In your title you wrote: (MRconjugateHeatFoam) - so I am asking myself what is the difference:

chtMultiRegion = conjugated heat Transfer of Multi region
(MRconjugateHeatFoam) = Multi Region conjugate heat Transfer

*****************************************
Hi,

I want to use MRconjugateHeatFoam. I think, it solves only the advection diffusion equation for fluid and diffusion equation for solid. Also, all the flid and solid properties are constant unlike the chtMultiRegionFoam.

The problem is it has defined only for two region, one for fluid and one for solid. However, chtMultiRegionFoam has the capability of using any number of regions. If you have used the MRconjugateHeatFoam to solve for more than two regions, please let me know how you change the code to add these new regions.

Thanks,
Kumudu
Kumudu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
convective scheme, fsi, heat transfer, multi-region

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestions for a multi region conjugate heat transfer problem maddalena OpenFOAM 14 September 4, 2013 18:03
Multi region meshing & recovering the original patch names fluidpath OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 4 May 19, 2013 19:13
Using starToFoam clo OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 33 September 26, 2012 04:04
StarToFoam error Kart OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 4, 2010 05:38
Import gmsh msh to Foam adorean Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 24 April 27, 2005 08:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:12.