
[Sponsors] 
simpleFoam  Convergence problem  Simple rectangular prism domain 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
April 26, 2013, 17:10 
simpleFoam  Convergence problem  Simple rectangular prism domain

#1 
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 5 
Hi
There is a convergence issue that I suspect I had done something wrong with the boundary conditions. === 1 === Brief description of the domain: Domain is a rectangular prism like a simple channel through which fluid flows. All lateral surfaces are set to slip boundary condition. Fluid flows from inlet to outlet. Brief description of the numerical setting: simpleFoam is used with komega SST turbulence model. Simples! === 2 === Mesh is generated in GAMBIT. Exported with ".msh" extention. Converted with "fluentMeshToFoam". checkMesh.log === 3 === RASProperties transportProperties controlDict fvSchemes fvSolution In my opinion, the setting is OK. === 4 === Fluid flows at a constant speed of 1.73 m/s from inlet to outlet. The "0" directory files are as follows: U p omega k === 5 === Residuals up to 400timestep 2 representative timeiteration detail from log file The velocity field is constant through entire volume of the domain. However, the pressure field varies towards outlet. It means to me, considering dynamic pressure is constant due to constant speed, the static pressure changes, IMHO. Plus, in my guess, there is something wrong with the streamwise velocity predictions as the number of iterations shoots up to 1000 at each time step: Code:
smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = 0.000153982, Final residual = 7.208e05, No Iterations 1000 I have found some other forum pages which consider the same error message in a slightly different context. Therefore, I somehow couldn't adapt the given answers to my case. I appreciate any help. Many thanks in advance. 

April 29, 2013, 04:00 

#2 
Senior Member

which version of OpenFOAM do you use?
it seems there is a bug for simpleFoam at 2.0.1, so i suggest to update your version, if you had, then it would be solved!
__________________
Training Course on OpenFOAM at (http://www.isme.ir/) My Weblog (http://openfoam.blogfa.com/) 

May 7, 2013, 13:08 

#3 
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 5 
Many thanks for your reply.
I have tried "fluent3DMeshToFoam" and it didn't work as well. The version I am using is 2.1.0. I suspect with the mesh itself. So that if anyone wants to have to look, I uploaded it to the post. Rectangular prism GAMBIT mesh 

May 8, 2013, 14:14 

#4 
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 5 
Hi,
== 1 == I found the reason why I have been obtaining such a high level of residuals. I have been using the script from "how to plot residuals". It seems the default script has been plotting the initial residuals rather than the final residuals. (In the script, f13 needs to be used instead of f9 to plot the final residuals.). == 2 == This muddling, however, contributed to an interesting observation to me. I have made 2 identical rectangular prism grids in GAMBIT and with blockMesh. The grid has (height x width x length) = ( 10 x 10 x 100) and meshed with a node per 1m. Case is simply steadystate and laminar flow where Re = 10 (as the characteristic length is 100). This is the residual plot from GAMBIT grid case. This is the residual plot from the blockMesh grid case. I found it interesting and wonder why? Would anyone could comment on it? Otherwise, let's note it as an experience and leave it. If anyone would glance at so that I uploaded both computed cases: GAMBIT&blockMeshGrid_Laminar_simpleFoam. Many thanks. 

May 9, 2013, 01:06 

#5 
New Member
Ali
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 4 
Dear Hakiki
Did you checked a positive initial value for the pressure? I mean although you are running an incompressible flow, setting p=0 may cause some problem. I am working on partly similar problem but compressible flow using rhoCenteralFoam. I have wrote some more details here. Do you have any idea for me? 

May 9, 2013, 04:59 

#6 
Senior Member
HECKMANN Frédéric
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 8 
Dear Ali, you cannot compare a compressible and an incompressible solver. The compressible solvers use the absolute pressure value while the incompressible solvers use the gauge value (or relative if you like).
Therefor, a compressible solver will crash if you set p=0 but not an incompressible solver as p=0 is actually equal to p=101325 (or whatever other pressure because the solver is independent of the ambient pressure). 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
CM+5 Convergence of the nonstationary problem  ILYA87  STARCCM+  0  May 22, 2011 04:35 
Heat Transfer simulation: No convergence problem  fiqs  CFX  2  April 21, 2010 15:47 
convergence problem  limseokmin  FLUENT  3  November 14, 2004 13:43 
extremely simple problem... can you solve it properly?  Mikhail  Main CFD Forum  40  September 9, 1999 09:11 
convergence problem with SIMPLER  NURAY KAYAKOL  Main CFD Forum  1  February 24, 1999 14:43 