|July 19, 2013, 10:59||
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7Rep Power: 2
after reviewing a number of forums it seems to me that the zeroGradient BC is often used as a filler conditions, when often the boundary condition should be extrapolated from the internal flow (supersonic outlets) or some other BC would better describe the actual physics.
I feel silly asking this but I take zeroGradient to mean d/dt of the field is zero at the boundary. So for velocity the acceleration would be zero, or in the case of T zero thermal conductive heat transfer etc.
Why is zeroGradient used in many cases were the gradient of the field is not actual zero?
Is it because there is not a readily available substitute?
It seem zeroGradient is one of the more stable BC (Ive been using rhoCentralFoam for microNozzle simulations that include some of the plume)
I looked at the source code and had trouble decyphering how the actual code works I just started teaching myself C++
and help is greatly appreciated
|July 19, 2013, 11:02||
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Nancy, France
Posts: 38Rep Power: 4
zeroGradient is actually not time derivative (dF/dt = 0) but spatial derivative (dF/dx = 0).
|boundary condition, physical model, zerogradient|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|second order schemes||marine||OpenFOAM||63||August 12, 2013 14:47|
|multiphaseInterFoam: timestep error by simulating a co-extrusion nozzle||Quatschinsky||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||6||June 26, 2013 06:59|
|Temperature Issue in OpenFOAM-2.2.0||prasant||OpenFOAM||0||March 12, 2013 09:17|
|Air Conditioned room groovyBC||Sebaj||OpenFOAM||7||October 31, 2012 16:16|
|Pressure instability with rhoSimpleFoam||daniel_mills||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||44||February 17, 2011 18:08|