|August 30, 2013, 08:38||
compressibleTwoPhaseEulerFoam: order of the alpha-setup makes a difference
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 7Rep Power: 5
I try to simulate an air stream with waterdroplets into an air-filled volume. Therefore I edited the bubbleColumn and the fluidizedBed tutorials to my needs, but the result was not satisfying. So I made a few testcases and found a strange behaviour.
I set up a case with 2 identical phases. They have the same thermophysicalProperties and the same transportProperties. The velocity is the same as well. The despersedPhase is set to both. So I varied the alpha. At first alphaair was 1 in the internalField and 0 in the inlet. In the second case it was just the other way round, alphaair was 0 in the internalField and 1 in the inlet.
I expected to see the same result, because the two phases have exactly the same properties. But to my surprise alpha and u behaved differently. Not completely different, but significant.
I digged around in the sourcecode but couldn't find any explanation.
Could anyone give me a hint why the two cases react differently?
If you want to have a look at the cases, here the zipped cases (in zip or tar format):
Of course you have to compare alphaair of one case with alphawater with the other case.
I would appreciate any hint
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|pathline difference in fan for 1 order and 2 order scheme||tongnan||FLUENT||1||August 27, 2013 15:31|
|Is the order of spatial difference can be improved||liqiang||Main CFD Forum||1||April 10, 2005 10:24|
|Higher order discretization on staggered grid||Chandra Shekhar||Main CFD Forum||9||January 27, 2005 17:31|
|High order compact finite difference||Mikhail||Main CFD Forum||3||February 16, 2004 00:31|
|High order compact finite difference schemes||Mikhail||Main CFD Forum||6||August 5, 2003 10:36|