CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

OpenFOAM is just using 2GB RAM?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By Kaskade
  • 1 Post By Kaskade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 26, 2013, 04:45
Default OpenFOAM is just using 2GB RAM?
  #1
Member
 
Frank Ubber
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12
kornickel is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

everytime I'm running a solver in OpenFOAM (simpleFoam, rhoSimpleFoam) it's just using 2GB of my 8GB memory, no matter if I'm running the case in parallel or not. Does anybody know why?
Doesn't OpenFOAM need more memory at all or is there a limitation in my system?

Best regards,

Frank Ubber
kornickel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2013, 05:12
Default
  #2
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,975
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
Greetings Frank,

That's perfectly normal if you are using a 32bit architecture of a Linux Distribution and/or using a 32bit build of OpenFOAM. To confirm each one, run:
Code:
uname -m
echo $WM_OPTIONS
  • If 32bit, it should give you:
    Code:
    i686
    linuxGccDPOpt
  • If 64bit:
    Code:
    x86_64
    linux64GccDPOpt
As for when running in parallel: each parallel application should be able to use 2GB, so in theory you could run 4 applications in parallel, where each one would occupy up to 2GB or RAM.

Best regards,
Bruno
__________________
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2013, 04:02
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15
Kaskade is on a distinguished road
How many meshes have you tried? Apart from some overhead running in parallel doesn't need more RAM. Maybe your mesh is just that small/coarse.
Kaskade is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2013, 13:46
Default
  #4
Member
 
Frank Ubber
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12
kornickel is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your answers! I think wyldckat is right, I tried it with several meshes and I was just wondering. Now I have a case including MRF.

I think it doesn't work because OpenFOAM still can't run MRF cases in parallel, is that right? At least when I run my case in parallel it still uses just 2GB and solving takes much more time than just running in on one server.
kornickel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 29, 2013, 14:11
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15
Kaskade is on a distinguished road
OpenFOAM can use MRF in parallel. But don't forget to add the AMIs to the nonRotatingPatches, otherwise it won't converge.

64bit Linux is faster than 32 bit Linux by the way. Just in case you aren't using it.
wyldckat and kornickel like this.
Kaskade is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2013, 11:45
Default
  #6
Member
 
Frank Ubber
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12
kornickel is on a distinguished road
Thanks, cascade! I don't have AMIs, just normal cyclic patches. Is that what you mean? And it actually does run in parallel, it's just about half as fast as when I run it on one core.
And I also have a 64bit Linux system running so I can't see why it's so slow!?
kornickel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2013, 12:09
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15
Kaskade is on a distinguished road
I don't know the name of the setting of the back of my head, but you need to mention the cyclic patches in the decomposeParDict. Otherwise the patches are separated and the amount of communication increases.

I usually set up AMIs for my MRF cases, so I have the option to run transient later on.

Also: run "renumberMesh" before and "mpirun -np *numberofcores* renumberMesh -parallel" after decomposing. Might help, doesn't have to.

How many cores do you have? Are you running Linux native or in a vm?

If your system is 64bit, OpenFOAM is 64bit as well. Did you compile it or install the binaries?
kornickel likes this.
Kaskade is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2013, 12:18
Default
  #8
Member
 
Frank Ubber
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 12
kornickel is on a distinguished road
Wow! That's a lot of useful information, thanks! I never ran a parallel simulation when I used cyclic patches. I did a quick research and found the option "preservePatches (cyclic_left cyclic_right);" in the decomposeParDict. Is that the way I mention these cyclic patches?

My machine has 8 cores (but I'm just going to use 4 of them), I am running OpenFOAM on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS native and I installed OpenFOAM via apt-get install.
kornickel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2013, 12:24
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Onno
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 120
Rep Power: 15
Kaskade is on a distinguished road
Yes, "preservePatches" is what I meant.

What command do you use to run the simulation? Is the correct number of cores being used?
Kaskade is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memory protection in OpenFOAM / combinig with FORTRAN botp OpenFOAM Programming & Development 2 February 15, 2016 12:25
OpenFOAM 1.5.x package - CentOS 5.3 x86_64 linnemann OpenFOAM Installation 7 July 30, 2009 03:14
OpenFOAM Install problem masb OpenFOAM 3 May 25, 2009 11:32
The OpenFOAM extensions project mbeaudoin OpenFOAM 16 October 9, 2007 09:33
using more than 2GB RAM on a windows PC Raju Main CFD Forum 10 October 22, 2006 03:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:04.