|April 30, 2014, 19:32||
boundary cond correct in U, not in paraview
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 12Rep Power: 4
I created a codedFixedBC with the following code
vector dir1 = vector(1,0,0);
vector dir2 = vector(0,1,0);
scalarField x = patch().Cf()&dir1;
scalarField y = patch().Cf()&dir2;
scalarField r = pow(pow(x,2) + pow(y,2),0.5);
operator == (vector(0,0,1)*r);
If it isn't evident the boundary condition is supposed to be linear growth in U_3 over a circular domain as a function of r
If I run the code for a single time step I can look at the nonuniform list<vector> for the patch at which this BC is applied. Here I can see a point having the value (0,0,0) which I would expect at the origin. If I examine the data in paraView using data along a line, or a point probe there is a non zero value of U_3 at (0,0,0). In fact the linear profile shows a distinct non zero plateau as the origin is approached.
Am I doing something dumb in paraView or is there actually a problem with my BC?
Any input is appreciated.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Domain Imbalance||HMR||CFX||5||October 10, 2016 05:57|
|Implementation of boundary conditions for FVM||Tom||Main CFD Forum||7||August 26, 2014 05:58|
|Error finding variable "THERMX"||sunilpatil||CFX||8||April 26, 2013 07:00|
|Water subcooled boiling||Attesz||CFX||7||January 5, 2013 04:32|
|CFX does not continue||Shafiul||CFX||10||February 17, 2011 08:57|