CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Steady state solution in chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam depends on kappa (t. conductivity)?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 7, 2014, 09:56
Default Steady state solution in chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam depends on kappa (t. conductivity)?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
karoltomek is on a distinguished road
Hello

I use chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam solver. My case is very simple. I have a box 1x1x2m with two aeras (hot and cold air) and baffle. I want to have steady state solution, and I think there is only one solition for my case (heat flow through baffle until temperatures in two aeras are the same).

But if I change the value of kappa in thermophysicalProperties for solid I have different final temperature in my box (!)
hotair >>> 400 K
cold air >>> 300 K

kappa=80 >>> T_final~310
kappa=8 >>> T_final~340
kappa=800 >>> T_final~300

Does anyone can help? Why kappa (thermal conductivity) change my steady-state solution? Other variables in thermophysicalProperties does not influence on solution...

Case is very simple and small (1 Mb), ready to run:
http://speedy.sh/4mGcf/my-case.zip
karoltomek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2014, 12:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Andrew Somorjai
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 12
massive_turbulence is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by karoltomek View Post
Hello

I use chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam solver. My case is very simple. I have a box 1x1x2m with two aeras (hot and cold air) and baffle. I want to have steady state solution, and I think there is only one solition for my case (heat flow through baffle until temperatures in two aeras are the same).

But if I change the value of kappa in thermophysicalProperties for solid I have different final temperature in my box (!)
hotair >>> 400 K
cold air >>> 300 K

kappa=80 >>> T_final~310
kappa=8 >>> T_final~340
kappa=800 >>> T_final~300

Does anyone can help? Why kappa (thermal conductivity) change my steady-state solution? Other variables in thermophysicalProperties does not influence on solution...

Case is very simple and small (1 Mb), ready to run:
http://speedy.sh/4mGcf/my-case.zip
So what you want is for the hotter side to stay constant while the cooler side warms up, that would be steady state. Were these the final temps of both sides or just the side with lower initial temperature?

kappa=80 >>> T_final~310
kappa=8 >>> T_final~340
kappa=800 >>> T_final~300
massive_turbulence is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2014, 15:12
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
karoltomek is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by massive_turbulence View Post
So what you want is for the hotter side to stay constant while the cooler side warms up, that would be steady state. Were these the final temps of both sides or just the side with lower initial temperature?

kappa=80 >>> T_final~310
kappa=8 >>> T_final~340
kappa=800 >>> T_final~300
Final temperature >>> temperature of both sides

I want to solve this problem:
at begining I have two fluids with different temperatures
- 400 K >>> hotter side
- 300 K >>> cooler side
and the baffle between them
the heat can flow only through the baffle

at the end I want to have the same temperatures on the both sides (this is my steady state solution), the temperature of hotter side decreases and the tepmerature of coller side increases until the temperatures are different

the problem is:
final temperature (the same in both sides) depends on kappa value and I don't undestand why... The final temperature must be always the same...
karoltomek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 8, 2014, 01:54
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 12
karoltomek is on a distinguished road
This screenshots shows my solutions.
When kappa=0 heat can't flow through the baffle, the temperatures don't change and this is ok.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg time_0.jpg (25.0 KB, 11 views)
File Type: png solution_kappa=8.png (81.0 KB, 12 views)
File Type: png solution_kappa=40.png (74.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: png solution_kappa=80.png (62.9 KB, 11 views)
karoltomek is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is it possible to predict how long it takes to reach steady state solution in unstead Alimohamadi_nasr CFX 4 November 11, 2013 06:11
Steady solution from Transient simulations wawa FLUENT 2 November 9, 2010 17:44
initialize flow field with steady state solution holg FLUENT 0 July 13, 2009 17:10
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems Lisa Main CFD Forum 11 July 5, 2000 14:37
Info: Short Course On Thermal Design of Electronic Equipment Arnold Free Main CFD Forum 0 August 10, 1999 10:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:31.