CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

SimpleFoam Case not converging

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2014, 08:09
Default SimpleFoam Case not converging
  #1
New Member
 
Dominik Allgaier
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11
Doflo is on a distinguished road
Hello CFDler,

I need your help. For several weeks I try to simulate the following case in OF: Itīs a probe in a box. In the first picture you can see the internal mesh (the upper and right plane of the box are defined as uotlet, the other four one are inlet).

Here some facts:
- SimpleFoam (basis motorbike tutorial)
- SST turbulence model
- snappyHexMesh for the probe surface
- boundaries:
Inlet:
U = fixedvalue (39 6 0)
p = zerogradient
Outlet:
U = zerogradient
p = fixedvalue 0
Probe:
U = fixedvalue (0 0 0)
p= zerogradeint

The fvsolution, fvscheme und control dicts are set by default.

Well, my problem is, that the results physically doesnīt make any sense.
So I plotted the residuals (2nd pictures) where you can see, that the case doensīt converge.

I think, one reason could be the boundaries at the corner between probe and outlet, as there is a huge velocitiy peak as you can see in the 3rd picture. Maybe the boundaries on the probe and the outlet donīt get along? Or is there something with the Tolerances?

Have you got some tips, how I can improve my case?

Thanks a lot in advance.
Best regards, Dominik
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Rechengitter.jpg (46.6 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg Residuen.jpg (34.2 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg Peak.jpg (17.0 KB, 23 views)
Doflo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2014, 10:16
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Dominik Allgaier
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11
Doflo is on a distinguished road
Here are three more pictures, which may help to understand the problem.

the inflow is 40 m/s and behind the probe the is a peak with 113 m/s, what canīt be. Moreover, the geometrical symmetrie doesnīt reflect in the results.

My suspicion is, that the boundaries on the probe surface and the outlet boundaries donīt get along with?

Best regards
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Slice1.jpg (22.0 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg mesh1.jpg (30.9 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg slice2.jpg (64.9 KB, 18 views)
Doflo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2014, 12:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Alexey Matveichev
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Nancy, France
Posts: 1,930
Rep Power: 38
alexeym has a spectacular aura aboutalexeym has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to alexeym
Hi,

Please post the following:

1. checkMesh output (as an attachment or in CODE block)

2. explain what do you mean by "default fvSchemes, fvSolution, and controlDict"

3. IC and BC for turbulent properties
alexeym is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
simpleFoam /water in pipes/ how to obtain and tune the solution? soonic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 March 29, 2012 10:40
How to copy the simpleFoam case to turboFoam sivakumar OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 5 November 18, 2009 02:49
Running a case with simpleFoam matteo_gautero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 March 28, 2008 07:13
SimpleFoam problems with converging maybe skewness hoochie OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 May 14, 2007 07:23
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF Fan Main CFD Forum 10 September 9, 2006 12:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19.