CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

conservative or non conservative, Is there a big difference?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 4, 2015, 11:37
Default conservative or non conservative, Is there a big difference?
  #1
Senior Member
 
Dongyue Li
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 664
Rep Power: 8
sharonyue is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,

Im using twoPhaseEulerFoam to simulate. we can see that in the latest version of OpenFOAM, this two-fluid model is rewritten into conservative form. before this, its non-conservative form.

Right now I know by doing some mathematical rearranging, this two form equations can be the same.

for example, see this formula:

by adding the term in the middle into non conservative form equation, we can get the conservative form equation.

So that means conservative and non-conservative equations can be converted.

But Im confused why sometimes we use non-conservative or conservative form to solve. Besides, we should expect non-conservative and conservative's result should be the same rite?

I quote this from Henry:

Also the fact that 2.3.x is conservative and 2.2.x isn't will affect the results.

can anybody explain this to me? because from formula, there two form's equation are the same one.

Also, I see Alberto is working on this solver to make it conservative, see this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by alberto View Post
[LIST=1][*]Write a two-fluid solver which does not rely on the phase-intensive formulation of the phase momentum equations. The phase intensive form is of great help in stabilizing the solution when the phase volume fraction tends to zero, but it introduces non-conservative terms, which might lead to problems in the solution under certain conditions (See for example Parks et al., Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol 239, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 2365-2371)
Generally, conservative form and non conservative form is very different in OpenFOAM?

Waiting for any kind of discussion. Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (11.0 KB, 50 views)
sharonyue is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2015, 04:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Dongyue Li
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Torino, Italy
Posts: 664
Rep Power: 8
sharonyue is on a distinguished road
I tried to do a comparison with FLUENT, Im sure 22x's result is better(non-conservative equations)

This happens on stirred tank using MRF.
sharonyue is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Difference Between serial run and parallel run case alundilong OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 December 5, 2014 09:27
big difference between clockTime and executionTime LM4112 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 20 February 19, 2014 08:20
Big difference in temps between real and computed evidence Main CFD Forum 10 January 26, 2014 07:18
XY plots big difference node and face values (thermal boundary layer) TfG FLUENT 0 May 14, 2009 09:02
Conservative finite difference scheme? Linfeng BI Main CFD Forum 1 October 10, 2002 12:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:37.