CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

oscillatingInletACMI2D tutorial case for compressible flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 6, 2015, 06:17
Default oscillatingInletACMI2D tutorial case for compressible flow
  #1
New Member
 
Jim
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 12
jimteb is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers,

Has anyone attempted to run the oscillatingInletACMI2D tutorial case using a compressible flow solver, e.g. rhoPimpleDyMFoam?

I am able to match the incompressible results fairly well when looking in paraView, however I am getting very large time step continuity errors, for both local, global and cumulative error. I have tried messing around with boundary conditions, discretisation schemes, etc., with no success.

Here is an excerpt from the run log:

Code:
solidBodyMotionFunctions::oscillatingLinearMotion::transformation(): Time = 1.34375 transformation: ((-0 -0.440455 -0) (1 (0 0 0)))
AMI: Creating addressing and weights between 40 source faces and 96 target faces
AMI: Patch source sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1, 0.648862
AMI: Patch target sum(weights) min/max/average = 0, 1, 0.259544
diagonal:  Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
rhoEqn max/min : 1.00876 1e-06
PIMPLE: iteration 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for e, Initial residual = 0.000354663, Final residual = 8.46498e-07, No Iterations 2
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0549391, Final residual = 8.04382e-06, No Iterations 18
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 7.69576e-06, Final residual = 7.69576e-06, No Iterations 0
diagonal:  Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.999997, global = 0.999997, cumulative = 3112.9
rho max/min : 1 1
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0231104, Final residual = 8.37962e-06, No Iterations 16
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 8.20122e-06, Final residual = 8.20122e-06, No Iterations 0
diagonal:  Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.999997, global = 0.999997, cumulative = 3113.9
rho max/min : 1 1
PIMPLE: iteration 2
smoothSolver:  Solving for e, Initial residual = 0.000157866, Final residual = 4.39831e-07, No Iterations 2
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0215709, Final residual = 7.47359e-06, No Iterations 11
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 7.48215e-06, Final residual = 7.48215e-06, No Iterations 0
diagonal:  Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.999997, global = 0.999997, cumulative = 3114.9
rho max/min : 1 1
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.0102435, Final residual = 7.53471e-06, No Iterations 14
GAMG:  Solving for p, Initial residual = 7.5762e-06, Final residual = 8.22582e-07, No Iterations 5
diagonal:  Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.999997, global = 0.999997, cumulative = 3115.9
rho max/min : 1 1
smoothSolver:  Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 0.00113894, Final residual = 1.12523e-07, No Iterations 3
smoothSolver:  Solving for k, Initial residual = 0.00123162, Final residual = 3.2464e-07, No Iterations 3
PIMPLE: converged in 2 iterations
ExecutionTime = 198.06 s  ClockTime = 198 s

Courant Number mean: 0.0944925 max: 0.495629
deltaT = 0.00208333
Time = 1.34583
Does anyone have any ideas how to get the time step error down? I would appreciate any help, thanks.
jimteb is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
acmi, compressible solver, time step continuity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Viscositymodel tutorial, problems when changing test case to cavity sur4j OpenFOAM Programming & Development 1 December 8, 2013 10:53
Different surface flow values - Incompressible case kornickel OpenFOAM Post-Processing 2 October 21, 2013 05:47
how to predict unsteady flow from case definition? Felix Main CFD Forum 6 August 28, 2007 17:40
Validation case for turbulent flow Ratan Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2005 04:03
Validation case for turbulent flow Ratan Main CFD Forum 0 October 4, 2005 04:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:34.