CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

How to calculate the smallest resolved time scale from a LES run in OpenFOAM?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By klilla

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 31, 2015, 09:42
Default How to calculate the smallest resolved time scale from a LES run in OpenFOAM?
  #1
Senior Member
 
cfdonline2mohsen's Avatar
 
Mohsen KiaMansouri
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CFD Lab
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 16
cfdonline2mohsen is on a distinguished road
Hello all Foamers

I usually choose the time step in LES based on the CFL number to be less than unity (or 0.5) in order to have a stable run.
Now, I want to calculate the smallest resolved time scale in my LES run to check whether the selected time step is suitable or not.
Any one can help me how to do that?
__________________
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.”
cfdonline2mohsen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2015, 05:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 12
hxaxtma is on a distinguished road
see here:

Kolmogorov Microscales

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov_microscales
hxaxtma is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2015, 07:21
Default
  #3
Member
 
Kapa Lilla
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bruxelles, Belgium
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17
klilla is on a distinguished road
Hi,

the smallest resolved time scale present in your simulation only can be approximated based on the numerical scheme you are using. A rule of thumb is that for a 1st order scheme you need 25 nodes/wavelength, for a 2nd order scheme appr. 16 nodes/wavelength (for standard schemes).

This means:
your scheme gives you NPW - number of points per wavelength
your mesh size is DX

Then the resolved wavelength can be calculated as: k = 2*PI/(NPW*DX)
From wavelength you can calculate the resolved frequency: f = k*c/(2*PI)
where c is the problem's propagation speed: incompressible simulation - flow speed, compressible simulation: sound speed.

Again, this is only a theoretical approximation.

If you really want to know exactly what scales you resolve and what not, plot the energy spectrum in some points and that gives you directly the cut-off frequency.

Best,
Lilla
rob3rt 0ng likes this.
klilla is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 3, 2015, 06:02
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 12
hxaxtma is on a distinguished road
I think I missunderstood the question :-) Thanks killa for your answer
hxaxtma is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] Contribution a new utility: refine wall layer mesh based on yPlus field lakeat OpenFOAM Community Contributions 58 December 23, 2021 02:36
Map of the OpenFOAM Forum - Understanding where to post your questions! wyldckat OpenFOAM 10 September 2, 2021 05:29
Star cd es-ice solver error ernarasimman STAR-CD 2 September 12, 2014 00:01
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 August 26, 2013 07:47
advection time scale Tanveer ahmad Rubani CFX 1 February 24, 2009 16:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:55.