|
[Sponsors] |
June 23, 2016, 10:50 |
Solving for a long geometry
|
#1 |
Member
Nikola
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello to everyone!
I am trying to solve a multi-region heat transfer problem and i am wondering how to avoid computing for a 10m long pipe. Is there a way to solve only for the initial part of the geometry and then jump to the last (where the direction of my fluid changes)? Thanks in advance! |
|
June 23, 2016, 12:23 |
|
#2 |
Member
Sheikh Ahmed
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 88
Rep Power: 10 |
You can save some of your computational time by dividing the domain into several blocks (multi-block) and the use finer grids to the inlet and outlet with relatively coarser grids at the middle. Also you can easily run in parallel.
|
|
June 24, 2016, 05:21 |
|
#3 |
Member
Nikola
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 60
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you for your response. Dividing in multiple blocks and refining the bottom and top parts of the geometry is what i did at the beginning. The problem is that the simulation ended up crashing the whole time because the mesh was not uniform.
I was wondering if there's a way of skipping the computation in the middle part of my geometry and having a guess of the "inlet" values for the upper part once the bottom one is solved. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem with Min/max rho | tH3f0rC3 | OpenFOAM | 8 | July 31, 2019 09:48 |
settlingFoam unstable? | bendel_boy | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 38 | July 8, 2016 05:07 |
Unstabil Simulation with chtMultiRegionFoam | mbay101 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | December 28, 2013 13:12 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 03:34 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 04:03 |