|August 3, 2016, 11:40||
No speedup observed after using renumberMesh
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 110Rep Power: 8
I have been using renumberMesh to speed up my parallel calculation of pimpleDyMFoam (for 17 million cells sperad across 256 processors, having AMI interface) but didn't observe any increase in speed compared to a similar case without using renumberMesh.
I used the utility after the parallel decomposition and the bandwidth decreased significantly to 2379 from 67180 after using the utility. Can someone let me know if he/she has obtained any increase in speed using this utility?
|August 3, 2016, 11:54||
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 57Rep Power: 5
I am not sure, but I believe you need to renumber before you decompose?
Also, if you have a large number of processor, the impact of renumbering will be much smaller.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|renumberMesh problems||Jonathan||OpenFOAM Pre-Processing||1||May 10, 2016 16:38|
|Some questions on blockMesh, decomposePar and renumberMesh||Leech||OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion||12||May 1, 2015 16:24|
|RenumberMesh causing divergence||altair279||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||0||April 1, 2015 18:33|
|Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13||msrinath80||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||18||March 3, 2015 06:36|
|Parallel efficiency and speedup info||lakeat||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||2||August 31, 2009 11:05|