Hi,
I am playing around wit
Hi,
I am playing around with OpenFoam for quite a while now but I still have my problems when it comes to choosing the "order" and "schemes" for those files. In general I understand what every entry does and what the influence should be - but lately I ran in trouble with a perfectly working set of files and I could not figure out why. My question would be if you have any general tips you can give me or even just paste a fvSchemes file you are using. Right know I try to get a very good result for the drag of a sphere in low Re number area (50 - 200) so far I am using IcoFoam, but I am open for any suggestion to improve my current results. My current fvSchemes: http://harly.de.vu/www/sphere/fvSchemes My current fvSolutions: http://harly.de.vu/www/sphere/fvSolution These files worked great for me for Re=200 and Re=150, but on the same mesh and lower Re (50,100) the Drag is too high. Thanks a lot - harly |
Hi Daniel,
I would use back
Hi Daniel,
I would use backward or CrankNicholson for ddt, limitedLinearV for convection, and I would tighten the tolerance a little both on p and U. Regards, Jose Santos |
Thanks for the input I will ru
Thanks for the input I will run a simulation with these settings and will report back - other comments are very welcome.
- harly |
So,
I am running now with t
So,
I am running now with the following modifications: ddtSchemes { default CrankNicholson 0.5; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) Gauss limitedLinearV 1.0 phi; } p PCG { preconditioner DIC; tolerance 1e-07; relTol 0; }; U PBiCG { preconditioner DILU; tolerance 1e-06; relTol 0; }; I will report back when I have some results. |
Hi Daniel,
did you have a better results with the new settings? Thank you MT |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:37. |