# Turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 16, 2009, 10:40 Hi everyone, I am running s #1 New Member   Sébastien Bocquet Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 21 Rep Power: 9 Hi everyone, I am running some 2D calculations over a flat plate, and comparing the openFOAM results with flu3m (Navier-Stokes CFD code from ONERA), Fluent and experimental/theoretical data. I am using 2 meshes. Here is a description of the case : Application : simpleFoam Kinematic viscosity nu=1.57e-5 mē/s Plate length L=1m Re (end of plate) = 4.4e6 divScheme : Gauss upwind Turbulence model : Spalart Allmaras First mesh : 0.15 < Y+ (first node) < 0.2 Second mesh (identical to first mesh with 35 first cells close to the plate removed) : 20 < Y+ (first node) < 23 Boundary conditions : Inlet : inlet Top : pressureOutlet Exit : extrapolatedOutlet Plate : wallFunctions U(inlet)=69.177m/s nut(inlet)=1.5e-5 mē/s nuTilda(inlet)=1.5e-5 mē/s p(inlet)=p(top)=pref=0 Initial conditions = boundary conditions at inlet For the first mesh : Plots of U+=f(y+) : At x=0.12 : At x=0.94 : For the second mesh : Plots of U+=f(y+) and mut/mu=f(y+) : At x=0.12 : At x=0.94 : Comments : The mesh with y+ around 20 gives satisfying results especially on the velocity profile at x=0.94 and the local friction Cf. At x=0.12, we have an offset on the U+ velocity profile in the log region and a smaller turbulent viscosity compared to flu3m and Fluent The finer mesh (y+ around 0.15) induces a significant offset on the U+ profile in the log region, with a smaller turbulent viscosity than the other calculations and an underestimated local friction (2.5e-3 compared to 3e-3 for the theoretical/experimental results at the end of the plate). If someone encountered a similar problem... Thanks in advance

 January 17, 2009, 04:30 Hi Sebastien, I'm working on #2 Senior Member   Ivan Flaminio Cozza Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Torino, Piemonte, Italia Posts: 207 Rep Power: 10 Hi Sebastien, I'm working on a similar case, a RANS over a flat plate at Mach 0.06 and Re 1.3x10^5. If you choose a wall-function treatment, you have to put your first cell at y+ around 30, if you want to use a y+ less than 1, you have to use a lowRe model, so if find some lowRe model suitable for a flat plate you can use it! Ivan

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Hoshang Garda FLUENT 1 November 27, 2013 11:24 seb62 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 16, 2009 10:33 seb62 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 January 16, 2009 10:30 Eldude Main CFD Forum 2 October 16, 2008 02:44 dwi s Main CFD Forum 1 November 9, 2000 02:45

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:33.