CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

SimpleSRFFoam or MRFFoam

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By waynezw0618

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 6, 2008, 09:30
Default hi everyone: if i want to c
  #1
Senior Member
 
wayne.zhang
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shanghai, Shanghai, P.R.China
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 9
waynezw0618 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to waynezw0618 Send a message via Skype™ to waynezw0618
hi everyone:

if i want to calculate a blade passage of turbomachine with a constant rotating speed.which is better?which will with less numerical error?
waynezw0618 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 6, 2008, 14:44
Default If it's only a rotor, SimpleSR
  #2
Senior Member
 
Chris Sideroff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa, ON, CAN
Posts: 371
Rep Power: 12
cnsidero is on a distinguished road
If it's only a rotor, SimpleSRFFoam is the most appropriate. 'SRF' stands for Single Reference Frame, hence the applicability for the rotor (i.e. one rotating reference frame).

However, if you are interested in both the rotor and stator then you will need MRFFoam. 'MRF' stands for Multiple Reference Frame, hence the applicability for the rotor passage (i.e. rotating reference frame) and the stator passage (i.e. stationary reference frame) - more than one reference frame.

Hope that helps.
cnsidero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2008, 04:45
Default Hi Chris: i know the meaning
  #3
Senior Member
 
wayne.zhang
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shanghai, Shanghai, P.R.China
Posts: 307
Rep Power: 9
waynezw0618 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to waynezw0618 Send a message via Skype™ to waynezw0618
Hi Chris:
i know the meaning of MRF and SRF. what i want is the explain in the way of numerical error.
here is some thing from ANSYS CFX help

Alternate Rotation Model(Alternate Rotation Model in CFX is the MRF in OF)
The alternate rotation model is a model for the advection term in the momentum equations. Instead of advecting the relative frame velocity, the flow solver advects the absolute frame velocity.

The main advantage of this model comes into play when the absolute frame velocity is a constant, but the relative frame velocity has a high swirl component. In this case, advecting the relative frame velocity has a high component of error, while advecting a constant absolute frame velocity will have much less error. If the relative and absolute frame velocities are both changing equally, for example, inside a blade passage on a rotating machine, then the alternate rotation model has a similar level of numerical error compared to the default advection model.

The alternate rotation model makes a significant reduction in numerical error when the absolute frame flow is essentially a constant flow parallel to the axis of rotation. For example, the approach flow to a fan or propeller is nearly constant in the absolute frame, but highly rotating flow in the relative frame. At very large radii, small errors in the advection model of the relative frame flow become large errors in the computed flow in the absolute frame. When the alternate rotation model is used in this situation, the numerical error is greatly reduced, because the absolute frame velocity is close to constant. In fact, the numerical error in the advection model reduces to zero as the absolute frame flow becomes axially constant, independent of the radial location and rotation rate.

Conversely, the model can increase errors when, for example, the exit stream is highly swirling. Errors are magnified as the length of the inlet or outlet regions is increased. The choice of whether to apply the model therefore depends on the nature of the inlet and outlet flow conditions, and the length of the inlet and outlet regions.

It has been found that in most realistic flow situations, the model reduces numerical error, and/or does not increase numerical error. The one exception is solid body rotation, where the relative frame flow is constant (=0) and the absolute frame flow is non-zero and varying with radius.


but i still can not understand if i want to calculate the impeller passage which will cause the less numerical error
giacky88 likes this.
waynezw0618 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleSRFFoam application usage and experiences cnsidero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 April 27, 2011 04:46
Boundary conditions for simpleSRFFoam cnsidero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 June 17, 2010 13:37
Ploblem using simpleSRFFoam abchavz OpenFOAM Bugs 0 February 7, 2009 13:14
Relative velocity in simpleSRFFoam miku OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 November 4, 2008 11:51
Building error with simpleSRFFoam and MRFSimpleFOAM in 15 waynezw0618 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 August 27, 2008 10:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:31.