|October 29, 2008, 04:48||
Dear all, in my current exa
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 28Rep Power: 8
in my current example I encountered a quite strange behavior of the moving mesh solvers.
I have a problem with complex geometry and a quite low quality tetrahedral mesh. When I run it with the turbFoam Solver (Version 1.4.1-dev and 1.5), everything is OK and the results are as expected.
When I use the turbDyMFoam solver on the absolutely identical case and specify the mesh motion to be zero everywhere, I expected to have no differences to the run with turbFoam, but the solution shows diveregence after arround 30 time steps (Courant number explodes).
How can this be? With no mesh motion, turbFoam and turbDyMFoam should produce the same results. I checked both with version 1.4.1-dev and 1.5.
Does anyone have any hints on this behavior?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Turbulent compressible solver rhoTurbFoam with dynamic moving mesh||eno||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||4||December 12, 2011 04:38|
|Turbulent solver or LES||philippose||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||8||November 13, 2008 07:01|
|Questions to Dynamic Mesh solver and diffusivity||florian_krause||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||12||January 11, 2008 22:33|
|Problems using dynamic mesh and 6dof solver||Brett||FLUENT||0||March 3, 2006 18:45|
|coupled solver and dynamic mesh||steph||FLUENT||0||June 11, 2004 08:28|