CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Getting the WallFunctionCoeffs

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 1, 2008, 05:49
Default Hi.. I'm trying to simulate
  #1
New Member
 
Mark Herskind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17
markh83 is on a distinguished road
Hi..

I'm trying to simulate a flow over an inclined step using TurbFoam and k-epsilon..

I would like to add a surface roughness to bottom face.. For this I've found the wallFunctionCoeffs, kappa and E.. Kappa is of course von Karman's constant (0.4187), but what is E? From Computational Fluid Dynamics (2007) by Versteeg & Malalasekera I can derive, that it is an integration constant that depends on the wall roughness and that E for a smooth wall is 9.793, and the book just ends by saying that E should be varied for other surfaces.. It then refers to Boundary Layer Theory (1979) by Schlichting. I've got my hand on the 2000 edition of this book, but in this, they use another formula.

The one I believe OpenFOAM uses is :
uPlus = (1/kappa)*ln(E*yPlys)

and the one from Sclichting is:
uPlus = (1/kappa)*ln(yPlus)+CPlus

So I still have the problem of not really knowing the correlation between surface roughness height and E.. Can anyone here name a book or give me a link to a source, concerning E, or just some values for E at different rougness'es?
markh83 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2008, 06:58
Default Just one point.The two equatio
  #2
lin
Senior Member
 
Hua Zen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Rep Power: 17
lin is on a distinguished road
Just one point.The two equations are basically the same.

1./0.4187*log(9.793)= 5.4494,which should be the CPlus value .

In fact,the CPlus value I remember is 5.5
lin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 1, 2008, 12:01
Default Thank you for the quick answer
  #3
New Member
 
Mark Herskind
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17
markh83 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the quick answer..

Yes, I know that the one can be isolated from the other. The problem is, that CPlus also seems to be emperical and i also need info on that one..

I have now ordered the 1979 edition of the Schlichting book, since my Versteeg book specifically says, that there ought to be tables for E in this..
markh83 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19.