CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Steady spray simulation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 17, 2008, 12:07
Default Dear Foamers, I would like
  #1
New Member
 
Max
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
didomenico is on a distinguished road
Dear Foamers,

I would like to implement a steady version of dieselFoam (as library), and to couple it to a steady solver (like simpleFoam). Main assumptions I am going to take are:

- each particle path has to be integrated until it goes out of the domain or evaporates completely. This means that the integration time has to be determined from the library itself and not inherited from the flow solver (as it is currently done in dieselFoam, I suppose)

- droplet-droplet interaction and wall treatment are discarded (at least in this phase).

My questions are:

- can the dieselFoam library be coupled directly to a steady solver or does it need a physical timestep to work? I have seen several calls to runTime(), therefore I suppose that such a (mis)use has not been foreseen...

- if not, should I start from the lagrangian library or can I re-use most of dieselFoam routines? I am trying to figure out where to start, but a hint would be appreciated...

Thanks,
Max
didomenico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2008, 12:23
Default Hi Max, i am pretty confuse
  #2
Senior Member
 
Stephan Gerber
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 8
stephan is on a distinguished road
Hi Max,

i am pretty confused: the whole process is pretty unsteady. when you speak about "integrated until it goes out of the domain" - dont you speak about intergration over are finite timestep?

regards
stephan
p.s. dieselFoam library does need a true timestep.
stephan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2008, 12:40
Default Dear Stephan, yes, you are
  #3
New Member
 
Max
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
didomenico is on a distinguished road
Dear Stephan,

yes, you are right, you have to perform the integration over physical times steps, but you can do it regardless to the actual time in your flow solver.
What I have in mind can be described as follows:
for(1, numberCouplingSteps)
<blockquote>for(1, numberOfFlowSolverIters || isSimpleConverged())
<blockquote>doSimpleStep(U, p, T, Y, spraySources);
endfor

doSprayIntegration(U, p, T, Y);

spraySources=getSpraySources();

spraySources.relax();</blockquote>
endfor</blockquote>

where

- doSprayIntegration() should perform particle integration as I have explained above (until particles disappear)

- numberCouplingSteps is the number of spray-flow iterations, in my experience few (from 3 to 10, according to the testcase) should be sufficient

- spraySources implement the coupling between phases and they enter in the solution of U, p, T and species equations. A relaxation could be necessary, in case of strong evaporation and/or combustion.

I know all limitation of such an algorithm, but I have not seen any example of steady spray with OpenFOAM.

Regards,
Max
didomenico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2008, 14:24
Default Hi Max, i am still confused
  #4
Senior Member
 
Stephan Gerber
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 8
stephan is on a distinguished road
Hi Max,

i am still confused but anyway: the calls of runtime in the dieselspray library are as far i remember only to get the actual timestep.
if you set something appropriate for your simulation it should work the way you want.
regards
stephan
btw: what about injection and the corresponding timeperiod?
stephan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2008, 03:07
Default btw: what about injection and
  #5
New Member
 
Max
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
didomenico is on a distinguished road
Quote:
btw: what about injection and the corresponding timeperiod?
This is another problem I have to face, since I would like to set a constant mass flow rate and not a constant amount of mass.

Actually I am realising that I have to rewrite the whole stuff, but I may re-use many things from the dieselFoam library...

Regards,
Max
didomenico is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2009, 10:27
Default
  #6
Member
 
Rachel Vogl
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 8
Rachel is on a distinguished road
Dear all,

I am also interested in a steady state dieselFoam solver. In my case there is a constant mass flow rate & hence the idea of steady dieselFoam.

Can anybody please guide me, how to proceed with the task of stead dieselFoam?

Max, did you have success with steady state implementation?
Rachel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 14, 2010, 16:37
Default Steady Spray Follow-up
  #7
ALC
New Member
 
Adam Comer
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 7
ALC is on a distinguished road
I realize this is an old thread, but I wanted to see if anyone has made any progress on developing a steady-state spray solver with combustion. I know that Fluent has this capability in its Discrete Phase Model, so I assume it is not too crazy of an idea.

Any information would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Adam
ALC is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
spray simulation adam CFX 10 June 8, 2013 15:59
Spray Simulation Fabio FLUENT 0 August 28, 2008 15:51
Sofware for spray simulation Joe Main CFD Forum 3 December 10, 2007 17:07
spray simulation CFD IƱigo Iparragirre Main CFD Forum 0 November 6, 2006 09:34
SPray simulation Nabeel mohsin FLUENT 3 March 19, 2004 19:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40.