|
[Sponsors] |
Patchinginitializing using derivedcustom boundary |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 9, 2008, 04:50 |
Hello,
I am having a few pr
|
#1 |
Member
nicolas
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I am having a few problems initializing my solution when using 'non-default' boundaries; i am using a turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet and a custom boundary (profile for U). In all these boundaries, there is a 'value' keyword, this value is used to initialize the flow. How can i use the correct boundary conditions (i.e. the profiles) to patch? One way would be to build a small application, but from what i have seen i do have to rewrite the profile parameters,... ideally i would just say, patch_using_boundaries() and U.write() and k.write(). I am generally using a variant of simpleFoam; but when using potentialFoam; i cannot get it to work properly because it doesnot pick up the 'complex boundaries' (not even this value keyword); and therefore U@inlet = 0, and nothing is solved. So i am looking for a way to patch my U,k and epsilon files (get these internalField nonuniform List<vector>,...) from original files. Regards, Nicolas |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary conditions for turbulent boundary layer | Thomas | FLUENT | 1 | June 17, 2008 05:14 |
boundary conditions for boundary layer flow | A. Al-zoubi | CFX | 0 | November 3, 2007 07:11 |
Slip Boundary Condition for Moving Boundary | Shukla | Main CFD Forum | 3 | November 11, 2005 15:02 |
pressure boundary VS. mass flow boundary | dalton | Main CFD Forum | 12 | April 3, 2005 23:52 |
Immersed boundary boundary treatment | AFP | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 30, 2004 07:16 |