CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Comparison OpenFOAM Fluent Experiment

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 14, 2006, 07:54
Default Hi Foamers, I conducted a com
  #1
New Member
 
Andras Horvath
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
andras is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers,
I conducted a comparison between OpenFOAM, Fluent and an experiment. The test case is a turbulent, isothermal free-jet (air/air) which was measured using LDA. The on-axis measurements were compared to steady state simulation results of OpenFOAM and Fluent. Further comparisons of other turbulence models and off-axis points will follow.

The computational domain (purely hex-cells):


Plot of velocity magnitude on the axis of the free-jet:

andras is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 08:12
Default Very interesting. At first gla
  #2
Senior Member
 
Gavin Tabor
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 8
grtabor is on a distinguished road
Very interesting. At first glance it isn't possible to say which code is performing better - is it possible to generate some kind of correlation coefficient between the experimental data and each computation?

What numerics are being used in OpenFOAM and Fluent respectively?

Gavin
grtabor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 08:20
Default A grid refinement study may al
  #3
Senior Member
 
Michael Prinkey
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 12
mprinkey will become famous soon enough
A grid refinement study may also be in order.
mprinkey is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 09:02
Default Hi I wrote an article for a
  #4
New Member
 
Julio Manuel Barros Jr.
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
jmb_jr is on a distinguished road
Hi

I wrote an article for a conference here in Brazil that compared all the turbulence models available in Fluent (2D axissymetric steady-state) with experiment results. It was interesting that all the models didn't predicted correctly the self-similarity and a significant discrepancy in all the Reynolds stresses was observed. I think it'd be interesting to show us the comparison of all the Reynolds stresses in the self-similarity condition.

Julio
jmb_jr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2006, 09:37
Default Hi all, what I can give you f
  #5
New Member
 
Andras Horvath
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
andras is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
what I can give you for now is a poster presentation (in german language) containing comparisons of turbulence models in Fluent and experimental data which was done by colleagues of mine. Have a look at figure 3 (Abbildung 3) in the top right corner ("Messung" means measurement). Figure 4 shows comparisons of core lengths in multiples of duct diameters.

http://www.cfd.at/download/gvc_freistrahl.pdf

Our simple 2-beam LDA can not measure turbulence intensities reproduceably. That is why we stuck to velocity profiles in the comparisons of experiments and CFD codes.


andras
andras is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 15, 2006, 03:09
Default Have you run some transient te
  #6
Senior Member
 
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 9
JBeilke is on a distinguished road
Have you run some transient tests for verification? I would never trust a steady state calculation for this type of flow configuration.
JBeilke is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2006, 10:20
Default Here is a snapshot (at 3.95s)
  #7
New Member
 
Andras Horvath
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 8
andras is on a distinguished road
Here is a snapshot (at 3.95s) from a transient simulation I have done recently to confirm the result of the steady state simulation presented above. The time step size was 0.001s.

This result is in good agreement with the steady state simulation.


andras is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 10:21
Default Hi all, In comparing fluent
  #8
New Member
 
Lourens Aanen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
lourens is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

In comparing fluent and FOAM in a very simple, steady calculation, I found a strange difference. My situation is:

2D
inlet with a uniform velocity (5 m/s),
uniform k (1) and
uniform epsilon (0.01).
symmetry boundary on the top.
smooth wall with wall functions on the bottom.
simple k-epsilon model

domain lenght 1000m
domain height 200m

I am not concerned on the wall functions, but on the decay of the turbulence over the length of the domain: in fluent both k and epsilon decay much faster compared with OpenFOAM.

Anyone any idea?

Regards,

Lourens.
lourens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 10:26
Default Are you using the same solver
  #9
Senior Member
 
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 338
Rep Power: 9
lr103476 is on a distinguished road
Are you using the same solver settings (discretisation schemes, convergence criteria, time step and turbulence modelling) in both Fluent and OpenFOAM?

Regards, Frank
__________________
Frank Bos
lr103476 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 10:36
Default I am using a steady calculatio
  #10
New Member
 
Lourens Aanen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
lourens is on a distinguished road
I am using a steady calculation, changing the time step in OpenFOAM does not make a difference, changing Fluent from linear to second order for all variables does not make any difference, both are using k-epsilon with the same coefficients. Have not yet tried to change discretisation schemes in FOAM. Any idea what discretisation schemes in FOAM should be used for the best comparison?
Length over which turbulence decays differs roughly a factor of 3.

Regards, Lourens.
lourens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 10:49
Default Well, the central scheme which
  #11
Senior Member
 
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 338
Rep Power: 9
lr103476 is on a distinguished road
Well, the central scheme which is the standard in OpenFOAM is comparable with the second order discretisation in Fluent, but Fluent applies some extra diffusion for stability. At least, that's my experience. You could also try upwind in both solvers, just for comparison.

Frank
__________________
Frank Bos
lr103476 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 10:50
Default Run checkMesh and see if the s
  #12
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,758
Rep Power: 21
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Run checkMesh and see if the size of both domains is the same. Maybe you did not scale the domain properly after mesh conversion.

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2007, 11:04
Default Checked the domain size and bo
  #13
New Member
 
Lourens Aanen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
lourens is on a distinguished road
Checked the domain size and both have the same size (domains are equal in paraview too). Did no scaling of the domain after mesh conversion.
I'll have a look if an other discretisation in FOAM makes any difference.

Lourens
lourens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2007, 16:02
Default Changing schemes in OpenFOAM o
  #14
New Member
 
Lourens Aanen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 8
lourens is on a distinguished road
Changing schemes in OpenFOAM or Fluent does not make the difference. The reason might be the extra diffusion mentioned by Frank. If I have time I will write down the equations and see if I can get an "decaying turbulence" curve by hand.

In the near future I will have the opportunity to do a comparison between a windtunnel experiment and a CFD calculation. The CFD package used will be Fluent, but I will try to compare the results with an OpenFOAM calculation too. One of the problems in the comparison is that I can't get the nutStandardRoughWallFunction, which seems to be programmes in OF1.4, working, see also
http://www.cfd-online.com/OpenFOAM_D...tml?1189679691

Anyone any idea?

Regards,

Lourens.
lourens is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 19, 2007, 17:09
Default I've once compared OpenFOAM an
  #15
sek
Member
 
Sung-Eun Kim
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 8
sek is on a distinguished road
I've once compared OpenFOAM and FLUENT for turbulent flow over an axisymmetric body at a range of incidence angles. In terms of the forces and moments, the OpenFOAM results using high-order discretizations closely matched the FLUENT results based on similar discretization schemes. The results were presented at this year's workshop, which I believe is posted somehwere.
sek is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 19, 2007, 18:02
Default Here it is: http://powerlab.fs
  #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 9
paka is on a distinguished road
Here it is: http://powerlab.fsb.hr/ped/kturbo/OpenFOAM/WorkshopZagrebJun2007/presentations/s lides/slidesKimZagreb2007.pdf
paka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 21, 2007, 10:09
Default Hi, I was asked to do some r
  #17
New Member
 
Oliver Krüger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8
oell is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I was asked to do some researches about OpenFOAM. So I did some Tutorials pand set up some own cases. My Professor is very satisfacted with the results and would like to see a comparison between OpenFOAM and Fluent or CFX. Therfor I googled a lot and could find a lot of interessting Stuff, but the problem is, that I couldn't find any time comparisons. Has somebody some facts about that? At least for the above mentioned freestream or the in the paper mentioned BOR body?

Regards,

Olli
oell is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2009, 10:25
Default information about BOR design
  #18
New Member
 
yann
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
yannocean is on a distinguished road
Hello, in this post sek describe a benchmark between UNCLE, FLUENT and OPENFOAM. the benchmark is floa past a BOR (Body Of Revolution). I would make the test case with OpenFoam myself for training. So where can I faind some details of the body, the shape?
Regards
Yann
yannocean is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2009, 19:31
Default LDA Data
  #19
Member
 
Newton KF
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 8
NewtonKF is on a distinguished road
Hi Andras, can you share the LDA data from your experiment??? And, can you tell more about your BCs??? I'm working on a LES code and I'm looking for some data to validate my code...

thanks in advance...

Newton.
NewtonKF is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 20, 2011, 03:51
Thumbs up boundary conditions for jet
  #20
New Member
 
tushar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 6
tushar is on a distinguished road
Dear Andras;
i am also interested in varifiying the openfoam computation with experimetnal results for the round jet case. can you post here the boundary condtions which you have used for jet. Thanking you.
regards
tushar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent OpenFoam comparison kepsilon model alimansouri OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 January 19, 2009 10:35
Comparison with experiment CFD_curious_guy Main CFD Forum 1 September 8, 2006 02:14
Comparison Reynoldsstress and RMS from experiment Frank Kiesewetter Main CFD Forum 0 May 23, 2003 13:16
comparison Of CFX with FLUENT rou CFX 3 April 26, 2003 01:10
comparison Of CFX with FLUENT rou FLUENT 1 April 1, 2003 19:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09.