CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

How to improve solution time for the SonicTurbFoam app

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 1, 2007, 03:16
Default Ladies and Gents, I am solving
  #1
Member
 
Shaun Darmody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 7
shaun is on a distinguished road
Ladies and Gents, I am solving a case which involves the RAE2822 airfoil. I have used the sonicTurbFoam solver because my flowfield has a freestream value of Mach 0.73, Re no of 6.5 * 10^6, 2.79deg AoA, Tinf = 300K. On the top surface of the airfoil I know speeds will go supersonic (approx 1.2 Mach). I have used a pressure-inlet-outlet for the farfield-in boundary and pressureTransmissiveOutlet for the outlet. Current timestep is 1e-06 and typical max Courant number is 0.42. I estimate I will need approx 2.85 seconds of total flow time to allow the flow from the inlet to pass to the outlet 5 times (147(m)/253.45(m/s/)). I am running parallel on 4 cpu's (two dual core Intel Xeon's, 4Gb RAM).

Given below is an output of a typical timestep report.

Time = 0.098347

Courant Number mean: 0.00275724 max: 0.426394
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 4.10529e-05, Final residual = 2.62615e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 3.03639e-05, Final residual = 3.48547e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for h, Initial residual = 0.000784216, Final residual = 2.38317e-08, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.00150568, Final residual = 9.3766e-09, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 6.48232e-06, Final residual = 2.45758e-09, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 7.69953e-08, Final residual = 3.94493e-11, No Iterations 1
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 2.35889e-09, global = 8.84185e-10, cumulative = -6.03889e-07
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 8.8288e-06, Final residual = 7.66856e-10, No Iterations 2
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1.837e-08, Final residual = 1.05416e-11, No Iterations 1
DILUPBiCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 5.82397e-10, Final residual = 5.82397e-10, No Iterations 0
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.42302e-08, global = 1.77953e-10, cumulative = -6.03711e-07
DILUPBiCG: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = 9.97207e-09, Final residual = 9.97207e-09, No Iterations 0
DILUPBiCG: Solving for k, Initial residual = 5.876e-10, Final residual = 5.876e-10, No Iterations 0
ExecutionTime = 5465.25 s ClockTime = 5536 s


As you can see, I don't think there is much more I can do to get this going any quicker. At this rate it will take some time to approach 2.85secs of total flow time with a timestep of 1e-06 secs. If I double this value I obviously get a doubling of courant number to approx 0.8. When I did this I would get spikes in courant number where it would go above 1. Is it best to keep courant number around 0.5 for this type of problem? Should I try the rhoSimpleFoam solver even though it supposed to be setup for low-mach flows (i.e. Should I try my luck with this as it is a steady-state app?)

Thanks for reading all this. If there are any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask them.

Cheers

Shaun.D
shaun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 2, 2007, 06:51
Default Hi Shaun, If you are seekin
  #2
Senior Member
 
Mark Olesen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: http://olesenm.github.io/
Posts: 774
Rep Power: 17
olesen will become famous soon enough
Hi Shaun,

If you are seeking a steady-state solution, a SIMPLE solver will definitely be the more economical solution. The rhoSimpleFoam solver can be coaxed a bit to improve the Mach range (up to approx 1.3), but for your case more modifications would be helpful.
If you cannot afford the normal support contract, perhaps OpenCFD will quote you for a smaller job. Or try to find other forum users to help fund this development.
/mark
olesen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 11, 2007, 03:34
Default Thanks Mark for your help. I h
  #3
Member
 
Shaun Darmody
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Rep Power: 7
shaun is on a distinguished road
Thanks Mark for your help. I have some more time to play with OF now, so I will run the problem in rhoSimpleFoam and see what results I get.

Cheers

Shaun.D
shaun is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
long time averaged solution in CFD RahDali Main CFD Forum 0 November 24, 2006 10:50
Calculation time sonicTurbFoam frederic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 22, 2005 01:54
time accurate solution student Main CFD Forum 2 December 20, 2004 15:34
Time dependent solution Thomas FLUENT 1 January 13, 2004 09:12
Time Dependant solution phil FLUENT 3 January 9, 2002 12:14


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20.