CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Moving polyhedrals and faceDecomposion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 7, 2007, 13:03
Default Hi, I used mergeMesh and s
  #1
Senior Member
 
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 338
Rep Power: 9
lr103476 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I used mergeMesh and stitchMesh to successfully combine two meshes in order to get some coarsening at the end of my computational domain. Between those two meshes, some polyhedrals are created.

Earlier in another topic it is mentioned there are two kind of decompositions: cellDecomposition (cell only) and faceDecomposition (cell and face). I assume one of those (depending on the compilation) is used by the laplaceTetDecomposition motion solver.

The problem I encountered was that I wasn't able to use icoDyMFoam on the moving polyhedrals. I solved this by recompiling the complete OpenFoam code with the faceDecomposition enabled instead of cellDecomposition.
Nevertheless some other utilities are still not working on the solutions of these moved polyhedral meshes, like liftDrag.

Now my question: what is the best way to solve the flow on moving meshes which contain some polyhedrals, such that everything still works.

Thanks....

Regards, Frank
__________________
Frank Bos
lr103476 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2007, 08:12
Default So concerning cellDecompositio
  #2
Senior Member
 
Frank Bos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 338
Rep Power: 9
lr103476 is on a distinguished road
So concerning cellDecomposition and faceDecomposition.

When is which method used? and why? Does the solution depend on your choice?

Can anyone give an explanation to the previous post. Thanks..

Frank
__________________
Frank Bos
lr103476 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 26, 2007, 08:30
Default There is absolutely no reason
  #3
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,761
Rep Power: 21
hjasak will become famous soon enough
There is absolutely no reason whey the kind of polyhedral decomposition you are using should interfere with the calculation of lift and drag. In fact, neither the top-level utility nor the liftDrag library depend on any of the FEM solver or utility applications. Could you please clarify.

Regarding the method and consequeices of various decomposition types, have a look at the paper Zeljko and I published (finally!) on the subject.

mesh motion paper

In any case, it is all about what kind of decomposition will give you nicer-looking tetrahedra. In cell decomposition, you split each face into triangles starting from point 0 and then build the tets using the cell centroid. For face decomposition, you add a point into the middle of the face, split it into triangles that way and build the tets using the cell centroid again.

A quick rule of thumb is:
- if you have a "standard split hex", some of terrahedra may end up with a zero or negative volume, which is not good
- as a quick reject criterion, if you've got 2 faces sharing 3 consecutive points, you should be using face decomposition.

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving Reference frame - UDF - Moving mesh modisa FLUENT 0 April 18, 2008 13:31
moving car Frank FLUENT 1 June 30, 2006 16:45
Moving Bed Ahmad Al-Zoubi CD-adapco 0 March 20, 2006 21:02
moving bed. MP CFX 0 February 9, 2003 19:51
Moving Bed MP FLUENT 1 January 13, 2003 00:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:49.