CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Strange epsilon

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 13, 2006, 03:23
Default I am running a simulation with
  #1
Member
 
chris book
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
chris1980 is on a distinguished road
I am running a simulation with the standart k-epsilon model. I have specified an initial condition for k=9.5 and epsilon=1750. However the volume averaged epsilon after the first time step is <epsilon> = 3700!

Can anybody shed some light into it why the volume averaged epsilon is some much different form the initial condition?
chris1980 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2006, 05:53
Default That's because your turbelence
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,758
Rep Power: 21
hjasak will become famous soon enough
That's because your turbelence is huge! Your velocity FLUCTUATION is 3.5 m/s - this is the speed I have trouble to walk on. Assuming turbulence intensity of 1%, your mean velocity would be the speed of sound (with a lot of turbulence).

I would revisit my initial condition, it does not look right.

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2006, 06:12
Default Hrv, I think a velocity flu
  #3
Member
 
chris book
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
chris1980 is on a distinguished road
Hrv,

I think a velocity fluctuation of 3.5 m/s corresponds not to k=9.4 m^2/s^2, instead a fluctuation of 2.52 m/s is right.

Do you agree ?

The turbulence data (velocity fluctuation, integral lengthscale) comes from a experimental turbulence generator (multihole plate) with an integral lenghtscale of 3mm.

In the experiment I want to simulate there is almost no mean flow but there is a sort of background turbulence created by the turbulence generator.

So do you still think there is a incorrect initial condition?
chris1980 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2006, 06:17
Default Ah, OK: if you have a turbulen
  #4
Senior Member
 
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,758
Rep Power: 21
hjasak will become famous soon enough
Ah, OK: if you have a turbulence generator and experiments, this may well be right. In that case, you should just let the flow develop and the model should do its job. As for k, I probably made a mistake:

k = 3/2 uPrime^2

I should have said 2.5 m/s, i.e walking speed :-)

Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak
Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk
hjasak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2006, 07:58
Default Hi, Epsilon usually scales
  #5
Member
 
Ola Widlund
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 8
olwi is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Epsilon usually scales something like K^1.5/(0.3*L). In your case this is 3e4. In that light the value after one time step is not very high, rather your initial value is very small.

/Ola
olwi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2006, 09:03
Default ok but the same case running w
  #6
Member
 
chris book
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
chris1980 is on a distinguished road
ok but the same case running with star give me averaged epsilons from 2000..6000! So I don't know where the big difference gomes into the game
chris1980 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2006, 09:05
Default What is resonable choice for e
  #7
Member
 
chris book
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 85
Rep Power: 8
chris1980 is on a distinguished road
What is resonable choice for epsilon (I use the compressible RNG-k-epilon model) in the case of no initial turbulence (i.e. k=1e-8)?
chris1980 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange boundaries for k and epsilon henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 January 7, 2009 03:54
Strange boundaries for k and epsilon henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 16, 2008 09:42
Strange boundaries for k and epsilon henning OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 16, 2008 09:34
derivation of epsilon equation of k-epsilon model Ricardo Rezende Main CFD Forum 5 May 1, 2007 05:38
Strange ? bob FLUENT 1 May 12, 2004 03:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26.