CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Forward step

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2006, 21:28
Default Hi I made some modifications
  #1
shuo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi
I made some modifications for the forward step under the solver sonicFoam. I changed the gas to air so that R = 286 J/kg-K, Cv = 723 J/kg-K.
The inlet velocity and temperature were fixed at 500m/s and 300K respectively, giving a Mach number of 1.5. THe pressure was increased to atmospheric conditions 101325Pa. When I tried to run the case the solution blew up due to the ridiculously high Courant number:

Time = 0.002

Mean and max Courant Numbers = 0 83.3333
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
BICCG: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 8.61837e-18, No Iterations 1
BICCG: Solving for Uy, Initial residual = 0.998465, Final residual = 2.95605e-17, No Iterations 1
BICCG: Solving for e, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 1.4773e-16, No Iterations 1
BICCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 1, Final residual = 5.63424e-07, No Iterations 9
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 1.32832e-05, global = 3.05962e-06, cumulative = 3.05962e-06
BICCG: Solving for p, Initial residual = 0.999905, Final residual = 4.4304e-07, No Iterations 36
diagonal: Solving for rho, Initial residual = 0, Final residual = 0, No Iterations 0
time step continuity errors : sum local = 0.00923335, global = 5.60188e-05, cumulative = 5.90784e-05
ExecutionTime = 0.17 s ClockTime = 0 s

SHuo
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2006, 02:15
Default I think is normal to diverge i
  #2
Senior Member
 
dmoroian's Avatar
 
Dragos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 11
dmoroian is on a distinguished road
I think is normal to diverge if you have such a high CFL.
Further on, it is normal to have such a high CFL, if you increase the velocity from 3 to 500. To compute the CFL number you use the velocity not Mach, so even if you preserve Mach but increase velocity, it is normal end up with an increased CFL (in case you preserve also the time step and the mesh).
On short: use a smaller time step or a coarser mesh.

Dragos
dmoroian is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speedup with GAMG for simplefoam forward Step tutlhino OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 June 24, 2007 21:44
forward step: treating singularity pt for WENO FV DSS Main CFD Forum 1 January 18, 2007 03:15
So what can we look forward to in CFX 11? Coanda CFX 9 June 5, 2006 22:41
Inviscid flow over a forward/backward facing step Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 3 February 16, 2005 10:18
Supersonic flow over a forward facing step Chan K I Main CFD Forum 1 October 19, 2000 16:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39.