CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Parallel processing and pitzDaily example

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2005, 03:33
Default Hi, I've got the pitzDaily
New Member
Ron W Cresswell
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
roncresswell is on a distinguished road

I've got the pitzDaily example running in serial and because it's going to take a long time to run I wanted to look at how much speedup I get in parallel.

I ran into the same problems as mentioned in this thread:
Parallel processing September 08 - 07:03 am

and fixed them the same way. I changed "vectorSpace" into "fixedList" and, in my case, added a "value" entry to one of the inlet boundary conditions in the "U" file in the 0 directory before decomposing. That all went well and no errors reported.

I then started to run the model over 15 machines and the problem seemed to diverge after about 75 time steps, giving the following message:

--> FOAM FATAL ERROR : attempt to use janafThermo<equationofstate> out of temperature range 200 -> 5000;T = nan

From function janafThermo<equationofstate>::checkT(const scalar T) const
in file /home/dm2/henry/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-1.2/src/thermophysicalModels/specie/lnInclude/ janafThermoI.H at line 73.

FOAM parallel run aborting

So this indicates that the temperature has blown up - but the serial run is fine. The mesh was decomposed with metis by the way (oh, that's obvious from the number of processors isn't it?!). In fact the serial run is currently at about time step 7300.

Is this just numerics associated with decomposing into "too small" subdomains, or could there be an error introduced by the decomposition that wasn't picked up at the time?
roncresswell is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2005, 19:02
Default Tried the 3D example instead -
New Member
Ron W Cresswell
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8
roncresswell is on a distinguished road
Tried the 3D example instead - got a signal 11 on one of the nodes. Took that node out of cluster and redecomposed - running fine. Faulty memory on a node - therefore the above *might* indicate a bug, but most likely doesn't. Ignore.
roncresswell is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallel Processing Hamidur CFX 2 September 27, 2007 13:03
parallel processing mvee FLUENT 3 September 18, 2007 03:18
FSI and parallel processing Jorn CFX 5 June 8, 2007 15:53
parallel processing: Ning FLUENT 0 March 19, 2007 13:41
Parallel Processing with NT Amir Khanlou FLUENT 6 March 3, 2003 15:35

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36.