CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Kepson model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 5, 2005, 17:25
Default HI, I am solving a tube flo
  #1
Senior Member
 
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 9
hsieh is on a distinguished road
HI,

I am solving a tube flow. The inlet veocity varies with time such that flow changes from laminar to turbulent (and then it may go back to laminar again). How do I deal with BCs for k and epslon in this case? Thanks!
hsieh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 6, 2005, 10:13
Default I think you will have problems
  #2
Member
 
Fabian Peng Karrholm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 8
fabianpk is on a distinguished road
I think you will have problems in calculating transition from laminar to turbulent flow using the k-epsilon model, since it cannot handle such flows (correctly).

/Fabian
fabianpk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 6, 2005, 10:59
Default Hi, Fabian and Pierre, Than
  #3
Senior Member
 
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 9
hsieh is on a distinguished road
Hi, Fabian and Pierre,

Thanks for the repies!

What will be the best model to handle transition? Thanks!

Pei
hsieh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 6, 2005, 11:01
Default Sorry for the typo! I meant "
  #4
Senior Member
 
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 9
hsieh is on a distinguished road
Sorry for the typo! I meant "replies" not "repies". (I pressed send too quickly)

Pei
hsieh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 2005, 05:27
Default I know that LES models can han
  #5
Member
 
Fabian Peng Karrholm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 8
fabianpk is on a distinguished road
I know that LES models can handle transition, it has to do with that you model all the scales of the turbulence in RANS models. This means that there can be no real dissipation of the turbulence according to the kolmogorov -5/3 theory.
Personally, I was quite uncomfortable with the variety of turbulence models before I read books and took classes about it, it's not really a matter of picking one, just any one. They all have different traits and work well or not depending on your flow.
Of course, you could always close your eyes and just run the case, it depends on what kind of accuracy you want.

/Fabian
fabianpk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 2005, 07:46
Default I think you guys are meaning e
  #6
Senior Member
 
Paulo Vatavuk
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Campinas, Brasil
Posts: 110
Rep Power: 8
vatavuk is on a distinguished road
I think you guys are meaning epsilon instead of epson (which is a printer).
vatavuk is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 2005, 10:00
Default Hi, Paulo, You never heard
  #7
Senior Member
 
Pei-Ying Hsieh
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 317
Rep Power: 9
hsieh is on a distinguished road
Hi, Paulo,

You never heard of k-epson model? I am surprise!
(just kidding, sorry about the typo). I need a spell checker.

Fabian,

I agree with you 100%. Around 14 years ago, when I attended my first APS conference in Cornell, Prof. Lumley said: Everytime I abroad an airplane, I am nervious because I wonder what turbulence model was used to design this plane.

This problem I am interested is a tube flow with water in it. Re # varies from 1000 - 3000 depending on inlet speed (inlet speed is a function of time). The goal is only to study qualitatively the difference between Re 1000 - 3000 (hopefully seeing the transition if it exists). LES will be time consuming to do. Now, my delemma is: Do I do this with my eyes close or open?

Pei
hsieh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2005, 05:09
Default Assuming you don't have so muc
  #8
Member
 
Fabian Peng Karrholm
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 8
fabianpk is on a distinguished road
Assuming you don't have so much time, maybe k-epsilon is the way to go. However, I suggest you try more than one model, maybe try a RSM model too?
I am not really an expert in the field, but I would treat the different Reynols numbers as separate cases. Thereby avoiding the transition, and just seeing what the difference between the cases are.

/Fabian
fabianpk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Population balance model for twofluid model pierre OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 26, 2014 03:39
changing model constants in k-e turbulence model Sunil CFX 3 October 3, 2006 12:12
DPM model w/ Wave model - errors in documentation HS FLUENT 0 April 12, 2006 04:37
Symmetry model half or total geometrical model in LES vvqf OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 3 March 22, 2006 10:06
Copying boundary conditions from model to model Lior FLUENT 3 September 23, 2004 16:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15.