
[Sponsors] 
July 10, 2005, 21:50 
I tried to produce a lid drive

#1 
Senior Member
Billy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 167
Rep Power: 8 
I tried to produce a lid driven cavity flow using interFoam. I set initial values of gamma in some cells to 1.0 and the rest to 0.0. I wanted to simulate a mixing of two fluids, however I get always the same message even using smaller time steps:
... Reading transportProperties Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Selecting incompressible transport model Newtonian Calculating field g.h time step continuity errors : sum local = 0, global = 0, cumulative = 0 Starting time loop Max Courant Number = 0 Time = 0.001 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 0 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 0 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 0 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 0 time step continuity errors : sum local = nan, global = nan, cumulative = nan ExecutionTime = 0.12 s ... Does anyone know what might be wrong? 

July 10, 2005, 22:22 
Actually the error looks like

#2 
Senior Member
Billy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 167
Rep Power: 8 
Actually the error looks like this:
... Max Courant Number = 0 deltaT = 0.001 Time = 0.001 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 time step continuity errors : sum local = nan, global = nan, cumulative = nan ExecutionTime = 0.1 s Max Courant Number = 0 deltaT = 0.001 Time = 0.002 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 Liquid phase volume fraction = 0.0625 Min(gamma) = 0 Max(gamma) = 1 time step continuity errors : sum local = nan, global = nan, cumulative = nan ExecutionTime = 0.22 s ... 

July 11, 2005, 06:40 
You seem to get a division by

#3 
Super Moderator
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,416
Rep Power: 16 
You seem to get a division by 0.
Also you have no flow? Nothing is solved for it seems? Do you have valid boundary conditions? Valid initial conditions? If you are interested in where it goes wrong: set the environment variable FOAM_SIGFPE to 1 which will make the code coredump and then look at the core in a debugger. 

July 11, 2005, 14:37 
I don't know what happened, bu

#4 
Senior Member
Billy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 167
Rep Power: 8 
I don't know what happened, but I know it was due to the mesh file. I created one using blockMesh and it worked OK. The original mesh file seemed OK when viewing it in paraview though. Does OpenFOAM automatically orient the face normals?


July 11, 2005, 17:50 
Yes, all boundary faces point

#5 
Super Moderator
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,416
Rep Power: 16 
Yes, all boundary faces point away from the owner cell. There is a section in the user guide about the mesh structure.


July 13, 2005, 15:05 
Hi,
After I got this case w

#6 
Senior Member
Billy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 167
Rep Power: 8 
Hi,
After I got this case working (Liddriven cavity flow with two phases) I noticed that altering the surface tension produces little effect on the output. I tried positive, negative and zero values of the surface tension and there seems to be no mix between the two fluids. Also, both fluids have same material properties such as density and viscosity. I assume that: A postive surface tension > immiscible A negative surface tension > miscible Is this right? PS: I wish to thank the OpenFOAM team for making available such a great software. 

July 13, 2005, 15:44 
interFoam uses a VOFtype meth

#7 
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 854
Rep Power: 13 
interFoam uses a VOFtype method to capture the interface which of course does not allow mixing of the phases, that is the point. Negative surface tension has no physical meaning and may very well destabilise the solution algorithm.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
driven cavity  neelam  Main CFD Forum  0  June 13, 2007 00:36 
Lid Driven Cavity 3D  Mathias Krause  Main CFD Forum  5  October 17, 2006 06:34 
3D Lid Driven Cavity  Danny  Main CFD Forum  0  October 22, 2002 03:09 
2D LidDriven cavity  Sophie  Main CFD Forum  8  April 28, 2002 18:34 
LidDriven Cavity  Paul Safier  Main CFD Forum  4  February 19, 2002 07:20 