CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Lagrangian track not support empty patch interaction?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 24, 2009, 20:54
Default Lagrangian track not support empty patch interaction?
  #1
Senior Member
 
su_junwei's Avatar
 
su junwei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Xi'an China
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 9
su_junwei is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to su_junwei
Dear All

It seems that the Lagrangian track methods in OpenFOAM don't support the empty patch. How to treat particle behaviors the 2D geometry with empty patch with these methods?

Junwei
su_junwei is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2009, 03:15
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
niklas's Avatar
 
Niklas Nordin
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 18
niklas will become famous soon enough
hmmm....tracking in 2D. not a good idea if you ask me.
And here's why.

Lets look at the for instance the momentum (mass and energy will suffer the same problem).
When we calculate the momentum gain/loss for the particle and transfer that to the gas the change in gas velocity will depend on the thickness of your 2D-slab.

If you make the slab very thick the gas will hardly feel the influence of the particles because the gas volume in 1 cell will be quite high.
On the other side, if you make it very very thin, the volume of the gas can be even less than the volume of the particle, hence the transferred momentum to the gas will result in a very fast respons on the gas.

If you do a 2d calculation on wedge you will have similar problem, a drop far from the axis of symmetry will influence the gas less than if its close to the center.

I hope that illustrates the problem.
niklas is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 25, 2009, 06:47
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
su_junwei's Avatar
 
su junwei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Xi'an China
Posts: 151
Rep Power: 9
su_junwei is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to su_junwei
Exactly Niklas

But there are some cases where a 3D simulation is more computational demanding especially for dense disperse flow, fluidized bed for instance. A possible way is using a pseudo 3D simulation with a direction with thickness equaling to the particle diameter.

If we treat the front and back plane as a wall, it will of course influence the continuous phase flow. It is better to make it an empty patch and do the simulation. In such a situation, removing the normal component of the velocity when encountering the empty patch can be a feasible way.

Junwei
su_junwei is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent3DMeshToFoam simvun OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 48 May 14, 2012 05:20
CheckMeshbs errors ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 March 11, 2009 03:34
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam matteo_gautero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 28, 2008 06:51
Import gmsh msh to Foam adorean Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 24 April 27, 2005 08:19
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:12.