CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

rotating wall inside of an MRF zone - fixedValue or movingWallvelocity?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By evrikon
  • 1 Post By evrikon

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 26, 2009, 06:29
Default rotating wall inside of an MRF zone - fixedValue or movingWallvelocity?
  #1
New Member
 
Oleksiy Kurenkov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nueremberg
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
evrikon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to evrikon
Hello together,

I simulate a simple axial fan with MRFSimpleFoam. Everithing works fine, however, I have got very low pressure jump predicted. I' looking now where mistake in my settings is.

The question is what the type of boundary condition I should use for the rotor. Rotor in my simulation is a rotating fan wall inside of the MRF zone and rotates of course with the same angular velocity as the whole MRF zone. If I would use fixedvalue; uniform (0 0 0) like in the tutorial mixerVessel2D, does it stay at rest? Should I take movingWallVelocity instead (s. below)?

From my ../0/U;
.....
boundaryField
{
STATOR
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform (0 0 0);
}

ROTOR
{
type movingWallVelocity;
value uniform (0 0 0);
...........

Other question for my full understanding: does MRF model in OF use an absolute velocity formulation or relative velocity formulation? "absolute" means it solves the equations still in non-rotating coordinate system, relative I mean as rotating coordinate system. This question refers to the problem I encountered, namely with absolute velocity formulation the wall should rotate, with relative should stay at rest relatively to the rotating zone where it is located in.

Alex
jiaojiao likes this.
evrikon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 17, 2009, 08:21
Default Resolved
  #2
New Member
 
Oleksiy Kurenkov
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nueremberg
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 8
evrikon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to evrikon
In the meantime I tried itself, read through the forum etc. If the case set up correctly fixed value condition for a wall inside of a rotating zone leads to correct radial velocity distribution on this wall. One can see it in paraview.
_Chris_ likes this.
evrikon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2013, 15:02
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 3
nash is on a distinguished road
hi evrikon,

sorry for bringing this old thread up.
do you manage to get the right pressure rise?
i simulate the radial fan now, and i got lower value of pressure rise. and the residuals of velocity fall only to 3rd order of magnitude.

for this simulation, i use approach of mrf and turbulence model laundersharma and komegasst (low re model implementation).

any suggestion for better result?
nash is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2015, 03:51
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 8
be_inspired is on a distinguished road
Quick question.
Did you make any faceZone? It is to know if boundary faces are selected or not ( including wall faces)
be_inspired is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
StitchMesh on two patches anita OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 31 April 4, 2013 11:51
Segmentation Fault in fluent3DMeshToFoam cwang5 OpenFOAM Bugs 23 April 13, 2011 15:37
Errors running allwmake in OpenFOAM141dev with WM_COMPILE_OPTION%3ddebug unoder OpenFOAM Installation 11 January 30, 2008 21:30
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
meshing F1 front wing Steve FLUENT 0 April 17, 2003 12:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:32.