|
[Sponsors] |
InterFOAM - Explicit or implicit? many doubts |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 27, 2020, 12:22 |
InterFOAM - Explicit or implicit? many doubts
|
#1 |
New Member
Diego Jerez
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi all!
in this topic i want to solve a doubt about interFoam solver. I want to run a simulation with a local-time stepping (LTS) method (https://openfoam.org/release/2-0-0/steady-state-vof/). When i used that method, i found that the method to solve the equations is CrankNicolson Scheme, wich is a implicit and numerically stable. Also, i found that the solver to "alpha water" used MULES wich is a semi implicit method that used a max courant number. My question is, the solver to alpha water is used to a intersection of the phases only? how this solver works? There are a relation between this two solvers that i mentioned? My mayor restlessness is that a implcit method dont use a courant number because his stability dont needem, but then other method used one. I very confusing about this, if anione can help me with and explication or document to read, i'd be very thankfull. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Implicit and Explicit finite difference discretization of steady state heat conductio | granzer | Main CFD Forum | 14 | May 3, 2019 15:24 |
wallFilm-solver: explicit or implicit? | fsch1 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 19, 2016 04:05 |
Newbie question about explicit and implicit methods | Yuby | Main CFD Forum | 10 | May 29, 2015 13:16 |
Explicit vs Implicit VOF in Fluent | MachZero | FLUENT | 5 | August 7, 2013 18:17 |
Euler (explicit or implicit) | anybody | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 8, 2006 02:12 |