CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Low Reynolds Number Instability in icoFoam - Cavity Case

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 8, 2009, 10:08
Default Low Reynolds Number Instability in icoFoam - Cavity Case
  #1
Senior Member
 
kmooney's Avatar
 
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Amherst, MA USA - San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 277
Rep Power: 9
kmooney is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has heard of a lower bound to Reynolds number stability...

I have been running highly viscous cases as part of my research and have been running into instability at very low Reynolds numbers ~1e-3. I tried simplifying the problem and running icoFoam with lid driven cavity at Re=1e-3 and it is highly unstable. The velocity grows in an unbound fashion rather quickly. The occurs regardless of the way that low Re is reached i.e. high viscosity or low velocity. This seems counter-intuitive in that typically low Re flows are computational stable.

Has anyone ever experienced this type of instability before or have any incite as to what is going on?

~Kyle
kmooney is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 8, 2009, 13:21
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
santos's Avatar
 
Jose Luis Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 213
Rep Power: 9
santos is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to santos
Hi,

Make sure your icoFoam time step guarantees a Courant number < 1. Remember that at such low Re diffusion governs your transport. In these conditions, the 'Courant' number (or stability parameter) you need is no more Co=U*dt/dx and is now Co=nu*dt/dx^2, where nu is the kinematic viscosity.

Regards,
Jose Santos
santos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 8, 2009, 14:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
kmooney's Avatar
 
Kyle Mooney
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Amherst, MA USA - San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 277
Rep Power: 9
kmooney is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the response,

Doesn't that CFL condition only apply to explicit treatment of viscosity? I failed to mention that I am treating it implicitly .

~Kyle
kmooney is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low Reynolds Number Flow over a Flat Plate Go FLUENT 4 August 28, 2013 05:19
Reynolds Number matching in Cavity flow Endee Main CFD Forum 6 April 20, 2010 04:47
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF Fan Main CFD Forum 10 September 9, 2006 12:24
DNS -low Reynolds number Airfoils Pat Main CFD Forum 2 January 21, 2005 15:17
recirculation at low Reynolds number Steven Main CFD Forum 7 November 27, 2000 18:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:47.