CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

Surface interpolation schemes and parallelization

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 25, 2010, 15:32
Default Surface interpolation schemes and parallelization
New Member
Jutta Adelsberger
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
jutta is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

I have a question regarding surface interpolation schemes and parallelization.

I'm working on global atmospheric flow simulations by solving the Euler equations in a spherical mesh setting. Essential elements of my framework are the following:
- rotating Cartesian coordinate system
- compressible Euler equations with Coriolis and centrifugal force (due to rotation)
- global 3D mesh of the earth's atmosphere consisting of truncated tetrahedrons.

For the calculation of the mass flux phi it was necessary to construct an own interpolation scheme of the volVectorField U based on rotation matrices. I don't see any possibility for avoiding such an interpolation in my spherical atmospheric framework. (Note, that in my setting this new interpolation is invariant under Galilean transformations.)

I wasn't able to define my interpolation as new surface interpolation scheme in OpenFOAM-1.6 because these schemes don't allow for tensors instead of scalars as weighting factors. So I defined it as a new non-derived function. Note, that I just want to use this interpolation for the explicit calculation of the mass flux in each time step (in contrast to my earlier question [Surface interpolation scheme with tensors as weighting factors] regarding the use of such schemes for the implicit treatment of the convection term and therefore the construction of the fvVectorMatrix).

In serial execution, my code works fine, but now I would like to run it in parallel. Since my interpolation isn't defined as regular surface interpolation scheme I get problems at the new boundary interface between the decomposed mesh parts. The values of phi at this boundary are incorrect because apparently, there's no communication/data exchange between the adjacent processors.

Do you know

- how to extend the surface interpolation scheme to allow for tensors as weighting factors or whether this has been implemented since?

- how to ensure parallel communication of processor data at the boundary for an own cell-to-face interpolation?

Thanks in advance,
jutta is offline   Reply With Quote


atmosphere, interpolation, parallelization, surface interpolation, tensor

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:42.