Why sovle e p U but not T p U in sonicFoam?
Hi, I am just curious why variable solved in sonicFoam are e p U. Then, calcualte T using function
inline scalar T (scalar f, scalar T0, scalar (specieThermo::*F)(const scalar) const, scalar (specieThermo::*dFdT)(const scalar) const ) const of class specieThermo. What is the benifit comparing to solve T p U. Thanks, yu. |
Hi Yu,
I think it is easier to include temperature-dependent thermodynamic properties (especially the heat capacity) when solving for e instead of T. Regards, Stefan |
Stefan,
Thank you for your reply. I agree. It will make a implict couple between heat capacity and temperature. Is that possible that solving e will give more smoother result than solving T? So, solving e will be more numerically stable> Thanks Yu Quote:
|
I guess that there are several difficulties to solve T instead of e.
1, solving e is to solve Cv*T, but involves only one variable, which makes code easier. 2, in openfoam, solving Cv*T is not straight forward. I tried different ways to put Cv in the equation, this one works, { solve ( Cv*fvm::ddt(rho, T) + Cv*fvm::div(phi, T) - Cv*fvm::laplacian(turbulence->alphaEff(), T) == - p*fvc::div(phi/fvc::interpolate(rho)) ); } However, it separate Cv and T, and make the scheme less accurate. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:22. |