CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/)
-   -   Heated Walls (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/79102-heated-walls.html)

vitor August 12, 2010 09:56

Heated Walls
 
Hi,

I'm performing a simulation both in OpenFOAM, Fluent and Code-Saturne with the same conditions and the same mesh.
The case is very simple: an axial flow in a straight pipe with heated walls. The conditions are:

Inlet: 0,05 m/s; 313K ; pressure: zeroGradient
Wall: 500K or 2000K; pressure zeroGradient
Outlet: Zero gradient for all; except for pressure: fixedValue = 0.

I initialized turbulence using the equations in the User Guide (Lid-Driven cavity tutorial).

The issue is that, although Code-Saturne and Fluent give me the same results, I'm getting different results from OF. As you can see below:

Wall Temperature Outlet averaged Temp (Fluent) Outlet averaged Temp (OF)
[K] [K] [K]

500 315,7 319,4
2000 336,2 370,0

I'm using the bouyantBouusinesqSimpleFoam. Can anybody give me a hint about what might be happening?
If you really want to help, please try to run the simulation yourself (it's very quick) and check if you get the same solution.

Thank you.

BR,
Vitor.

KrisT August 13, 2010 03:21

What are the dimensions of the pipe? Is turbulence needed, the speed is so low, isn't the flow laminar?

vitor August 13, 2010 08:11

The diameter is 6m (about 20ft) and the lenght 20m (65.6ft), it gives a Reynolds number (for water) equal to 0,05*6/(1e-6) = 3e5 , wich is a lot greater than 2300, so the flow must be turbulent.

Thank you.

KrisT August 14, 2010 04:12

Big pipes.

One thing you could do would be to do the simulations on a smaller domain, where the flow is laminar. If you get the same results with the different solvers then you know it is related to the turbulence model.

vitor August 14, 2010 13:05

Good idea.

I think I`ll give it a try.

Thanks.

vitor August 16, 2010 14:47

What puzzles me is that I've performed the same simulation with a heat flux at the wall instead of temperature at the wall, and it gave me the same results as Fluent and Code-Saturne.

But in the heat flux case I specified the cp (specific heat) of the water, and in the other case I only specified the Prandtl number.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:09.