|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi,
I have a question about the difference in the calculation of the two different turbulence models Standard-k-€ (high-Re) and a low-Re model such as LaunderSharmak€. I think I have read that the high-Re model is proned to calculate turbulent eddies bigger than they are in reality. Alleged due to great values of viscosity. Because of that it is allegedly better to use a low-Re model such as LaunderSharmak€ to avoid this problem. I'm not sure if this is right, so if anyone knows something more about that please let me know. Best Regards, tH3f0rC3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Gregor Olenik
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 5 ![]() |
hi,
low-Re models are used in wall bounded flows with resolved boundary layer since turbulent fluctuations and therefore the turbulent viscosity (leads to a low Reynolds number) are damped near walls. So when to use a low-Re model depends on your case. Different turbulence models normally have different scopes and it is your job to find the right one for your case ![]() you can find some details in the Fröhlich BookLarge Eddy Simulation turbulenter Strömungen p. 52 gregor |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Low Reynolds Number SST Model | Josh | CFX | 30 | April 17, 2013 18:29 |
| low reynolds number models in Fluent | doug | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 4, 2012 14:39 |
| y+ value too low for use in standard wall function | Allan Cross | FLUENT | 3 | August 26, 2005 03:11 |
| Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 05:12 |
| CFD code for very low Re Flow | Raj | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 31, 1999 22:06 |