- **OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/*)

- - **One question about the discretization of governing equation in OpenFOAM**
(*http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/openfoam-solving/95370-one-question-about-discretization-governing-equation-openfoam.html*)

One question about the discretization of governing equation in OpenFOAMI found there is an extra term in some solvers. I am not sure about the reason. For example in the TEqn.H of buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam. The scalar matrix is constructed via
fvScalarMatrix TEqn ( fvm::div(phi, T) - fvm::Sp(fvc::div(phi), T) - fvm::laplacian(kappaEff, T) ); The second term seems not necessary here. And it also make the discretization become nonconservative. I wonder why this is necessary. In contrast in the UEqn.H in the same solver tmp<fvVectorMatrix> UEqn ( fvm::div(phi, U) + turbulence->divDevReff(U) ); Such term does not appear. Can anyone explain why we need this? Thanks a lot. Best Regards, |

Hii,
The line is added to have values of T bounded in the algorithms like SIMPLE where we have partial convergence of pressure. Check this: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...silon-eqn.html |

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58. |