CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD

is buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam right choice for laminar flow with heat transfer

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 2, 2012, 00:09
Unhappy is buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam right choice for laminar flow with heat transfer
  #1
New Member
 
Aru
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CA, US
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14
monsoon is on a distinguished road
Hi All,

I am running a simple case of incompressible fluid flowing through a cylindrical channel at Re= 100 (velocity = 0.07 m/s) with constant wall temperature. My flow should be fully developed at the end of the channel as per my calculations. Thus I should be expecting the maximum velocity at the exit to be twice the mean inlet velocity therefore making it 0.14 m/s.

My problem is that buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam gives me 0.12 m/s which is more than 10% error. I would not have expected such high error for such a simple case. Increasing the mesh density does not resolve the problem. My question is that is buoyantBoussinesqSimpleFoam the right solver for laminar cases or is there a better solver which handles this. I am also using zero gravity in my case. The mesh has been generated in Netgen as shown.
Any guidance would be appreciated.
Thanks
Aru
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (48.2 KB, 36 views)
monsoon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2012, 05:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 16
duri is on a distinguished road
Your results are not very off, there can't be problem with solver. Try using higher order accurate schemes you will get good match.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2012, 16:20
Default Higher order works
  #3
New Member
 
Aru
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CA, US
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 14
monsoon is on a distinguished road
Thanks Duri, You are right. changing to higher order scheme improve the results to 0.133 m/s which is just about 5 % error.
monsoon is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 15, 2013, 02:58
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Bin Xu
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 14
norkistar is on a distinguished road
Hi, Can you help to send me your case folder for my reference, I am currently doing similar project, I want to see how is the setting for 0, system and constant. Many thanks and best regards. norkistar@126.com
norkistar is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff swahono OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 10 October 15, 2018 05:43
heat transfer with laminar flow David_010 OpenFOAM 10 November 16, 2012 16:05
Granular Flow with Heat Transfer ANKW FLUENT 0 August 23, 2011 12:23
Flow and Heat transfer in a Thawing chamber B.Prabhu FLUENT 0 May 12, 2002 15:13
Heat transfer coefficent in turbulent flow Ola Lindgren Main CFD Forum 2 November 17, 1998 05:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:54.