OF 2.x, cyclic boundary and MRFSimpleFoam compatibility
Hello dear forum
Did anybody experiment OF 2.1.0 with cyclicAMI boundaries and MRFSimpleFoam ? Is it supposed to work ? I used to do that with OF 1.5-dev. I'm testing OF 2.1.0, from RPM packages for SUSE. I get following error : Code:
Reading field p Thanks in advance, and best wishes Jean-Michel PS : many thanks and congratulations to OF maintainers team for the last evolutions of the software : AMI, edges in SHM, packaging |
I configured a cyclicAMI case last weekend (using rotationally cyclic boundary conditions), and it seemed to work smoothly. Granted, I'm having convergence issues with MRFSimpleFoam, but I'm fairly certain it's a setup issue and has nothing to do with the AMI implementation (It's looking like the boundary patches need to be further offset from the rotating features).
Can you provide more detail on your case? Perhaps post the case files if they aren't too big? |
[SOLVED] cyclicAMI + MRFSimpleFoam crash
Hi Mickael
Thanks for your attention. Finally I found the fix on the forum. Running following command did the job : Code:
unset FOAM_SIGFPE This forum is very good. Thanks to everybody Regards jean-Michel |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
plz tell me it is true???or not???
hi Dear Foamers.
I want to add k(kinetic turbulence energy) in one solver. for this reason added this line in code : const volScalarField &k=U_.db().lookupObject<volScalarField>("k") and wmake was Successfully . but How can I Understand that this k is the same with k(kinetic turbulence energy)???Is it true????? Because I replase another world in this : const volScalarField &M=U_.db().lookupObject<volScalarField>("M") but not error occured!!!!!!?????? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20. |